Total complaints
1
Filed since Duri
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows my Credit card company ruled against me because the owner of XXXX XXXX simply provided a false receiptsignatures for the transactions. He ran my CC against his app's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Duri. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Duri
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How my Credit card company ruled against me because the owner of XXXX XXXX simply provided a false receiptsignatures for the transactions. He ran my CC against his app's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and eventually closed out and opened up a new account. During this time I was contacted by Citi Security CC Company | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and simply forged my signature | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and I said no | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
my Credit card company ruled against me because the owner of XXXX XXXX simply provided a false receiptsignatures for the transactions. He ran my CC against his app has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Duri, and the most recent logged activity is During thi, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, my Credit card company ruled against me because the owner of XXXX XXXX simply provided a false receiptsignatures for the transactions. He ran my CC against his app reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "and eventually closed out and opened up a new account. During this time I was contacted by Citi Security CC Company", and the single most common underlying issue is "and I said no".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating my Credit card company ruled against me because the owner of XXXX XXXX simply provided a false receiptsignatures for the transactions. He ran my CC against his app: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
my Credit card company ruled against me because the owner of XXXX XXXX simply provided a false receiptsignatures for the transactions. He ran my CC against his app has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
my Credit card company ruled against me because the owner of XXXX XXXX simply provided a false receiptsignatures for the transactions. He ran my CC against his app has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against my Credit card company ruled against me because the owner of XXXX XXXX simply provided a false receiptsignatures for the transactions. He ran my CC against his app is "and I said no" in the "and eventually closed out and opened up a new account. During this time I was contacted by Citi Security CC Company" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.