Total complaints
1
Filed since Thei
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Thei. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Thei
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security complaint mix by product
- equivocations 1 100.0% – 0% relief
How more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| equivocations | 1 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| as the phone number may well have been reassigned to another customer by that date. Synchrony Bank is fully responsible for any breach of account security due to their grossly irresponsibility and negligence. | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and outright lies : 1 ) Synchrony Bank was informed by me on XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX pm EST that my XXXX phone number was no longer valid and should never be used to send security codes or other account confirmation information. During that same call | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security
more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Thei, and the most recent logged activity is Their rece, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "equivocations", and the single most common underlying issue is "and outright lies : 1 ) Synchrony Bank was informed by me on XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX pm EST that my XXXX phone number was no longer valid and should never be used to send security codes or other account confirmation information. During that same call".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security have?
more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security respond to complaints on time?
more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security?
The most common issue reported against more than XXXX weeks after I informed them telephonically that the XXXX phone number was no longer valid. This constitutes a gross violation of account security is "and outright lies : 1 ) Synchrony Bank was informed by me on XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX pm EST that my XXXX phone number was no longer valid and should never be used to send security codes or other account confirmation information. During that same call" in the "equivocations" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
