2026 data Public-data reference. official source

meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since On X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
On X
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since On X

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). after the: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% after the 100.0%
  • after the 1 100.0% 0% relief

How meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
after the expiration of the introductory rate 1

Top States

State Complaints
and so the computer had applied the payment incorrectly. They assured me that the issue would be corrected and to give them 10 business days to correct it. They placed a referral to the back office '' to get the 9.9 % interest rate reinstated. I was told I would be notified once the interest rate had been corrected. 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
enough to pay off the balance transfer amount as well as make the minimum payments on the other flex plans. The funds were actually removed from my bank on XX/XX/23 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX

meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 0 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to On X, and the most recent logged activity is On XX/XX/2, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "after the expiration of the introductory rate", and the single most common underlying issue is "enough to pay off the balance transfer amount as well as make the minimum payments on the other flex plans. The funds were actually removed from my bank on XX/XX/23".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX have?

meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX respond to complaints on time?

meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX?

The most common issue reported against meaning that they had not applied the payment to the higher 24.4 % interest balance for the balance transfer. I called the company and spoke to 2 agents and a supervisor ( XXXX ). They informed me that the issue with how the payment was applied was because the company 's computer system hadn't updated on XXXX is "enough to pay off the balance transfer amount as well as make the minimum payments on the other flex plans. The funds were actually removed from my bank on XX/XX/23" in the "after the expiration of the introductory rate" product category.

Related