Total complaints
30
Filed since # #
30 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
30 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows LLC's complaint history from CFPB public records. 30 consumers have filed complaints since # # . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
30
Filed since # #
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How LLC's 30 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| punitive damages | 3 |
| results | 1 |
| LLC that started on XX/XX/XXXX and I have spent several months updating my documentation for Ocwen Loan Servicing | 1 |
| I called back to again request my case resolution. The operator again tried to contact XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| Transunion is required to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation of disputed information. In Cushman v. Trans Union Corp. | 1 |
| on XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| that the above named company remove any and all derogatory remarks | 1 |
| I sent a second email formally disputing the debt and again requested validation under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ). XXXX days later | 1 |
| XXXX AND XX/XX/XXXX. THIS IS A FACTUAL ERROR WE'VE TRIED TO EXPLAIN TO THEM BUT THEY DONT LISTEN AND NOW WANT US TO BE IN A SHORT SALE- WE DO NOT WANT THAT. WE APPEAL AND PLEASE APPROVE OUR FIRST TRIAL PERIOD REQUEST XX/XX/XXXX THROUGH XX/XX/XXXX FOR A LOAN MODIFICATION ON OUR ONLY HOME. WE DISPUTE AND APPEAL THEIR DECISION TO DENY OUR FIRST LOAN MODIFICATION REQUEST BECAUSE WE WERE COMPLIANT WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TRIAL PERIOD XX/XX/XXXX | 1 |
| XXXX is aware and has proof in the attachment labeled as Exhibit A ( Contract ) that Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC | 1 |
| XXXX is aware and has proof in attachment labelled as Exhibit A ( Contract ) Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC | 1 |
| LLC responded by sending a letter with absolutely no information and did not include the requested information from any of the correspondence sent out with certified mail validation. This included NO notarized under penalty of perjury Affidavit of Truth responding to my Affidavit of Truth line by line signed by the CEO | 1 |
| there was no indication of collection activity being initiated | 1 |
| 10 seconds XXXX 9 minutes | 1 |
| CA XXXX To TransUnion XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX | 1 |
| it is incumbent on the consumer reporting agency to permanently **delete and cloak** the [ facially inaccurate or misleading ] information. '' ( Cortez quoting Cousin v. Trans Union Corp. | 1 |
| LLC I contacted the original companies that owned the accounts ; XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX Debt Recovery Department advised me that the original date of delenqency was no longer available to them as the account had been charged off and sold to LVNV FUNDING | 1 |
| violating 15 U.S.C. 1681b | 1 |
| I reviewed it in its entirety and it seems that Jefferson Capital Systems | 1 |
| LLC. or any associated entities. Furthermore | 1 |
| consumer | 1 |
| This letter serves as a formal follow-up and final notice concerning my previous disputes related to account reported by XXXX XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| I found what I thought was a discrepancy between my total payments and the balance due. The balance never seemed to go down. Between XXXX to present | 1 |
| XXXX | 1 |
| I am being personally pursued as an individual guarantor. As such | 1 |
| you will find detailed documentation outlining the issues I have encountered | 1 |
| and in the state of their principle offices in XXXX. Also | 1 |
| FCRA | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Duluth | 3 |
| 617 F.3d 688 ( 3d Cir. 2010 ) Holding XXXX liable for failure to verify and correct. | 3 |
| also known as Mercedes-Benz XXXX XXXX | 2 |
| 520 F.3d 1066 ( 9th Cir. 2008 ) * * CRA can be held liable for unreasonable investigation * * * Guimond v. TransUnion | 1 |
| I have been suffering economic and emotional hardship.,,Ocwen Financial Corporation,NY,10552,,Consent provided,Web,2015-08-12,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1514653 | 1 |
| d/b/a Central Financial Control.,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION,FL,33409,,Consent provided,Web,2017-02-01,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,2312419 | 1 |
| 520 F.3d 1066 ( 9th Cir. 2008 ) | 1 |
| stating that the debt was owed to XXXX XXXX and they were asked to collect. On XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| which I have no relationship with. | 1 |
| Inc. dated XXXX DRAWN ON XXXX CHECK # XXXX was sent AND DELIVERED TO THE COMPANY IN XXXX Colorado Facility USPS TRACKING NUMBER XXXX SLS RECEIVED BUT DID NOT CASH OR APPLY THE XX/XX/XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX CHECK TO THE ACCOUNT. THEREFORE | 1 |
| LLC or any company that they represent and whom I have no contract with for an alleged debt I do not owe. Instead | 1 |
| XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| that the amount I owe them is not correct. That I had sent in the bank statement I was asked to send in. At that time did she notice that my bank statement was in fact scanned into my account | 1 |
| Case No. XXXX | 1 |
| 617 F.3d 688 | 1 |
| has access to the information for the original date of delinqency but did provide me with a fax number to contact someone in their account archives/recovery department to request a thorough look-through of my account. | 1 |
| 617 F.3d 688 ( 3d Cir. 2010 ). | 1 |
| is suing me for {$2400.00}. | 1 |
| and its representatives. | 1 |
| doing business as NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION adverse action taken against me denying me my rights pf which the civil damages pursuant top 15 USC 1640 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( iii ) are up to {$5000.00} NAVY FEDERAL FINANCIAL GROUP | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| costs | 3 |
| LLC | 2 |
| I will initiate formal arbitration proceedings and I would still want to pursue statutory and punitive damages that I requested on experian dispute # # # XXXX XXXX Violations : * Failure to code disputed account properly ( e.g. | 1 |
| XX/XX/XXXX of updating documentations and weekly phone calls | 1 |
| also with no success. At this time | 1 |
| the court emphasized that a consumer reporting agency can not merely parrot the information received from furnishers. Yet Transunion issued a perfunctory response stating only that these accounts belong to me | 1 |
| LLC and on XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| statements | 1 |
| which I received on XX/XX/XXXX. That letter did not include a contract | 1 |
| WIRE TRANSFER | 1 |
| or any superior of Portfolio Recovery Associates | 1 |
| on XX/XX/XXXX | 1 |
| and all calls are recorded. That I owe {$260.00}. I went through the entire back story again. The same story I told on XX/XX/XXXX & XXXX | 1 |
| President & CEO Via Certified Mail XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX after XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Trans Union LLC | 1 |
| 368 ( 5th Cir. 2001 ) ) ( emphasis added ) [ 1 ]. Thus | 1 |
| LLC for the account information | 1 |
| 1681i ( a ) | 1 |
| was suing me for a debt that I had absolutely no knowledge of. Jefferson Capital Systems | 1 |
| including emails | 1 |
| doing business as NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION . I was notified of this transgression of my rights by NAVY FEDERAL FINANCIAL GROUP | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
LLC has accumulated 30 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 25 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 25 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to # # , and the most recent logged activity is Your conti, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, LLC reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 3.3% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "punitive damages", and the single most common underlying issue is "costs".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating LLC: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
LLC has received 30 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
LLC has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against LLC is "costs" in the "punitive damages" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.