Total complaints
1
Filed since So a
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows it was their error I had better receive those fee credits!! they were so nice to give me. Later XXXX writes or calls telling me because my payment did not go through I must pay cash or money orders. Again went back to the bank's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since So a. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since So a
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How it was their error I had better receive those fee credits!! they were so nice to give me. Later XXXX writes or calls telling me because my payment did not go through I must pay cash or money orders. Again went back to the bank's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and days later | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| asking them to send a letter to optimum this was NOT my fault so my being able to pay by debit card would be reinstated. I tried on about XXXX separate occasions. Said they did finally. Unfortunately that was not the truth. I have stayed with the bank | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| he simply said I am messing up. No I was not. So I sent back an email saying I 'd chalk it up as him being a man. Later I received an email from the woman who opened my account not to send 'harassing ' emails to XXXX | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
it was their error I had better receive those fee credits!! they were so nice to give me. Later XXXX writes or calls telling me because my payment did not go through I must pay cash or money orders. Again went back to the bank has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to So a, and the most recent logged activity is So at some, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, it was their error I had better receive those fee credits!! they were so nice to give me. Later XXXX writes or calls telling me because my payment did not go through I must pay cash or money orders. Again went back to the bank reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "and days later", and the single most common underlying issue is "he simply said I am messing up. No I was not. So I sent back an email saying I 'd chalk it up as him being a man. Later I received an email from the woman who opened my account not to send 'harassing ' emails to XXXX".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating it was their error I had better receive those fee credits!! they were so nice to give me. Later XXXX writes or calls telling me because my payment did not go through I must pay cash or money orders. Again went back to the bank: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
it was their error I had better receive those fee credits!! they were so nice to give me. Later XXXX writes or calls telling me because my payment did not go through I must pay cash or money orders. Again went back to the bank has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
it was their error I had better receive those fee credits!! they were so nice to give me. Later XXXX writes or calls telling me because my payment did not go through I must pay cash or money orders. Again went back to the bank has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against it was their error I had better receive those fee credits!! they were so nice to give me. Later XXXX writes or calls telling me because my payment did not go through I must pay cash or money orders. Again went back to the bank is "he simply said I am messing up. No I was not. So I sent back an email saying I 'd chalk it up as him being a man. Later I received an email from the woman who opened my account not to send 'harassing ' emails to XXXX" in the "and days later" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.