Total complaints
1
Filed since Desp
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows in violation of the FCRA and FDCPA.,,Maximus Federal Services's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Desp. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Desp
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How in violation of the FCRA and FDCPA.,,Maximus Federal Services's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| these entities have failed to provide competent evidence demonstrating : That I owe the debt to the creditor as named That the amount claimed is accurate and lawfully calculated That the alleged debt is legally collectible and not time-barred That they possess lawful ownership or authority to collect That they have a permissible purpose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act That they are properly licensed or authorized to collect debts from a consumer residing in XXXX | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Inc.,MD,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2025-12-16,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,18083539 | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| including : A bill of sale for each transfer or assignment Proof that my specific account was included in each sale Documentation showing that each transfer legally authorized collection and credit reporting Without this documentation | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
in violation of the FCRA and FDCPA.,,Maximus Federal Services has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Desp, and the most recent logged activity is Despite la, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, in violation of the FCRA and FDCPA.,,Maximus Federal Services reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "these entities have failed to provide competent evidence demonstrating : That I owe the debt to the creditor as named That the amount claimed is accurate and lawfully calculated That the alleged debt is legally collectible and not time-barred That they possess lawful ownership or authority to collect That they have a permissible purpose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act That they are properly licensed or authorized to collect debts from a consumer residing in XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "including : A bill of sale for each transfer or assignment Proof that my specific account was included in each sale Documentation showing that each transfer legally authorized collection and credit reporting Without this documentation".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating in violation of the FCRA and FDCPA.,,Maximus Federal Services: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
in violation of the FCRA and FDCPA.,,Maximus Federal Services has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
in violation of the FCRA and FDCPA.,,Maximus Federal Services has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against in violation of the FCRA and FDCPA.,,Maximus Federal Services is "including : A bill of sale for each transfer or assignment Proof that my specific account was included in each sale Documentation showing that each transfer legally authorized collection and credit reporting Without this documentation" in the "these entities have failed to provide competent evidence demonstrating : That I owe the debt to the creditor as named That the amount claimed is accurate and lawfully calculated That the alleged debt is legally collectible and not time-barred That they possess lawful ownership or authority to collect That they have a permissible purpose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act That they are properly licensed or authorized to collect debts from a consumer residing in XXXX" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.