Total complaints
4
Filed since AND
4 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
4 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows IN THIS CASE!!!!'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 4 consumers have filed complaints since AND . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
4
Filed since AND
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How IN THIS CASE!!!!'s 4 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| ALMOST 4 MONTHS LATER | 4 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| WITH AN UPDATED DATE ON IT IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT THIS NEGATIVE REMARK IS TOO BE REMOVED FROM MY ACCT! I I HAD TO REACH OUT TO XXXX @ TD BANK ( XXXX CONTACT INFO IS LISTED ON THE CORRESPONDENCE DOCUMENTATION SHE SENT ME VERIFYING TD BANK MADE AN ERROR AND WAS REMOVING THE NEGATIVE 30 DAY REMARK ). BUT ONCE AGAIN BECAUSE I HAD DISCOVERED THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED DID NOT INCLUDE THE CORRECT ACCOUNT NUMBER! SO AFTER I DID MY OWN INVESTIGATION | 1 |
| WITH AN UPDATED DATE ON IT IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT THIS NEGATIVE REMARK IS TOO BE REMOVED FROM MY ACCT! I I HAD TO REACH OUT TO XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ONCE AGAIN BECAUSE I HAD DISCOVERED THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED DID NOT INCLUDE THE CORRECT ACCOUNT NUMBER! SO AFTER I DID MY OWN INVESTIGATION | 1 |
| WITH AN UPDATED DATE ON IT IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT THIS NEGATIVE REMARK IS TOO BE REMOVED FROM MY ACCT! I I HAD TO REACH OUT TO XXXX @ XXXX XXXX ONCE AGAIN BECAUSE I HAD DISCOVERED THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED DID NOT INCLUDE THE CORRECT ACCOUNT NUMBER! SO AFTER I DID MY OWN INVESTIGATION | 1 |
| WITH AN UPDATED DATE ON IT IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT THIS NEGATIVE REMARK IS TOO BE REMOVED FROM MY ACCT! I I HAD TO REACH OUT TO XXXX @ XXXX XXXX ONCE AGAIN BECAUSE I HAD DISCOVERED THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED DID NOT INCLUDE THE CORRECT ACCOUNT NUMBER! SO AFTER I DID MY OWN INVESTIGATION | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
IN THIS CASE!!!! has accumulated 4 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 4 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to AND , and the most recent logged activity is AND AGAIN, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, IN THIS CASE!!!! reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "ALMOST 4 MONTHS LATER", and the single most common underlying issue is "WITH AN UPDATED DATE ON IT IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT THIS NEGATIVE REMARK IS TOO BE REMOVED FROM MY ACCT! I I HAD TO REACH OUT TO XXXX @ TD BANK ( XXXX CONTACT INFO IS LISTED ON THE CORRESPONDENCE DOCUMENTATION SHE SENT ME VERIFYING TD BANK MADE AN ERROR AND WAS REMOVING THE NEGATIVE 30 DAY REMARK ). BUT ONCE AGAIN BECAUSE I HAD DISCOVERED THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED DID NOT INCLUDE THE CORRECT ACCOUNT NUMBER! SO AFTER I DID MY OWN INVESTIGATION".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating IN THIS CASE!!!!: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
IN THIS CASE!!!! has received 4 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
IN THIS CASE!!!! has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against IN THIS CASE!!!! is "WITH AN UPDATED DATE ON IT IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT THIS NEGATIVE REMARK IS TOO BE REMOVED FROM MY ACCT! I I HAD TO REACH OUT TO XXXX @ TD BANK ( XXXX CONTACT INFO IS LISTED ON THE CORRESPONDENCE DOCUMENTATION SHE SENT ME VERIFYING TD BANK MADE AN ERROR AND WAS REMOVING THE NEGATIVE 30 DAY REMARK ). BUT ONCE AGAIN BECAUSE I HAD DISCOVERED THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED DID NOT INCLUDE THE CORRECT ACCOUNT NUMBER! SO AFTER I DID MY OWN INVESTIGATION" in the "ALMOST 4 MONTHS LATER" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.