2026 data Public-data reference. official source

( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure

2 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

2 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows ( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure's complaint history from CFPB public records. 2 consumers have filed complaints since ( 3 . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

2
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
( 3
Since

Total complaints

2

Filed since ( 3

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 2

( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 2 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). made in: 2 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% made in 100.0%
  • made in 2 100.0% 0% relief

How ( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure's 2 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
made in a record under penalty of perjury 2

Top States

State Complaints
and ( iv ) the declarer can not reasonably obtain possession of the check because the check was destroyed 2

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
( ii ) the declarer is the drawer or payee of the check 2

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About ( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure

( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure has accumulated 2 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 2 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to ( 3 , and the most recent logged activity is ( 3 ) Dec, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, ( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "made in a record under penalty of perjury", and the single most common underlying issue is "( ii ) the declarer is the drawer or payee of the check".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating ( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does ( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure have?

( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure has received 2 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does ( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure respond to complaints on time?

( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about ( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure?

The most common issue reported against ( iii ) the loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful seizure is "( ii ) the declarer is the drawer or payee of the check" in the "made in a record under penalty of perjury" product category.

Related