ignorance etc. This is completely unacceptable particularly when we made it perfectly clear from day 1 we accept the house as-is. This was not a sale

What the CFPB Record Shows About ignorance etc. This is completely unacceptable particularly when we made it perfectly clear from day 1 we accept the house as-is. This was not a sale

ignorance etc. This is completely unacceptable particularly when we made it perfectly clear from day 1 we accept the house as-is. This was not a sale has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to To m, and the most recent logged activity is To make ma, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, ignorance etc. This is completely unacceptable particularly when we made it perfectly clear from day 1 we accept the house as-is. This was not a sale reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "UWM and XXXX XXXX XXXX THEN TRIED TO COVER THEIR BEHINDS BY HAVING THE APPRAISAL COMPANY ALTER/REWRITE THE ORIGINAL APPRAISAL TO THE BENEFIT OF UWM BY NOW STATING A TERMITE INSPECTION WAS NEEDED WHEN THE ORIGINAL APPRAISAL MADE NO MENTION OF A TERMITE INSPECTION. This was done XX/XX/XXXX the day AFTER we were supposed to close and resulted in financial harm to the claimant. This is disgraceful", and the single most common underlying issue is "after 3-4 tries I got someone at UWM to tell me the deal wasn't being funded because a contingency wasn't addressed. WHAT?? Ultimately XXXX said we need a termite inspection. Really".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating ignorance etc. This is completely unacceptable particularly when we made it perfectly clear from day 1 we accept the house as-is. This was not a sale: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.