I will pursue litigation for : Under the FCRA : Statutory damages ( 15 U.S.C. 1681n ) Actual damages ( 15 U.S.C. 1681o ) Punitive damages Attorneys fees Under the FDCPA : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} Actual damages Attorneys fees Under the FCCPA : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} per violation Punitive damages Attorneys fees and court costs All rights are fully reserved.

What the CFPB Record Shows About I will pursue litigation for : Under the FCRA : Statutory damages ( 15 U.S.C. 1681n ) Actual damages ( 15 U.S.C. 1681o ) Punitive damages Attorneys fees Under the FDCPA : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} Actual damages Attorneys fees Under the FCCPA : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} per violation Punitive damages Attorneys fees and court costs All rights are fully reserved.

I will pursue litigation for : Under the FCRA : Statutory damages ( 15 U.S.C. 1681n ) Actual damages ( 15 U.S.C. 1681o ) Punitive damages Attorneys fees Under the FDCPA : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} Actual damages Attorneys fees Under the FCCPA : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} per violation Punitive damages Attorneys fees and court costs All rights are fully reserved. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XXXX, and the most recent logged activity is XXXX. FLOR, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, I will pursue litigation for : Under the FCRA : Statutory damages ( 15 U.S.C. 1681n ) Actual damages ( 15 U.S.C. 1681o ) Punitive damages Attorneys fees Under the FDCPA : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} Actual damages Attorneys fees Under the FCCPA : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} per violation Punitive damages Attorneys fees and court costs All rights are fully reserved. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "PDM holds : Florida Consumer Collection Agency License : XXXX Status : Active Expiration : XX/XX/year> While PDM is licensed", and the single most common underlying issue is "compliant operation at all times Even with a license".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating I will pursue litigation for : Under the FCRA : Statutory damages ( 15 U.S.C. 1681n ) Actual damages ( 15 U.S.C. 1681o ) Punitive damages Attorneys fees Under the FDCPA : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} Actual damages Attorneys fees Under the FCCPA : Statutory damages up to {$1000.00} per violation Punitive damages Attorneys fees and court costs All rights are fully reserved.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.