Total complaints
3
Filed since Seco
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility
3 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
3 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility's complaint history from CFPB public records. 3 consumers have filed complaints since Seco. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
3
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
2
States Active
Seco
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility complaint mix by product
- I have 3 100.0% – 0% relief
How I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility's 3 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I have submitted the same exact disputes multiple times dating back almost 3 years. The information I provided was accurate and true. All statements | 3 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| etc. ) in those determinations for decades. Along with XXXX XXXX assistance and child support ( for an absent parent on XXXX XXXX ) never received and in a second mortgage as documented in my HUD form provided to them from the now sale of my property. And individual statements and information on my consumer statement continue to disappear off of my report that need to be there. As it is illegally and intentionally being reported as adverse and negative impact on my report that should not be. | 2 |
| etc. ) in those determinations for decades. Along with XXXX XXXX assistance and child support ( for an absent parent on XXXX XXXX ) never received and in a second mortgage as documented in my HUD form provided to them from the now sale of my property. And individual statements and information on my consumer statement continue to disappear off of my report that need to be there. As it is illegally and intentionally being reported as adverse and negative impact on my report that should not be. | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and a large majority of my credit statements were altered | 3 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility
I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility has accumulated 3 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 2 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 3 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Seco, and the most recent logged activity is Second, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I have submitted the same exact disputes multiple times dating back almost 3 years. The information I provided was accurate and true. All statements", and the single most common underlying issue is "and a large majority of my credit statements were altered".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility have?
I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility has received 3 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility respond to complaints on time?
I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility?
The most common issue reported against I was informed by a supervisor from the Department of Labor that my account was marked as fraudulent with zero notification or any reasoning for marking as such. It wasn't fraudulent. The only thing that was fraudulent was I reported to the Inspector General and Directors of government agencies that the only piece of documentation that was used in my assistance determinations was my XXXX XXXX mortgage statement. They did not include any of the other documentation of all my other bills ( utility is "and a large majority of my credit statements were altered" in the "I have submitted the same exact disputes multiple times dating back almost 3 years. The information I provided was accurate and true. All statements" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
