Total complaints
1
Filed since Fast
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows I was denied. The reason given was Status of Existing/Prior Account. I called the number provided ( XXXX ) to their credit operations team and spoke with XXXX XXXX whom informed me that my earlier account had been revoked. I attempted to explain the situation but she wouldn't hear it. Like before's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Fast. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Fast
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How I was denied. The reason given was Status of Existing/Prior Account. I called the number provided ( XXXX ) to their credit operations team and spoke with XXXX XXXX whom informed me that my earlier account had been revoked. I attempted to explain the situation but she wouldn't hear it. Like before's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| maybe they go this straightened out on their side and so I completed a prequalification ( reference XXXX ). Despite having perfect credit with a FICO of 750+ | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I needed to be transferred to that Bankruptcy department and guess what - they're closed right now and I'd have to call another day. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| no derogatory remarks or collections at all | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
I was denied. The reason given was Status of Existing/Prior Account. I called the number provided ( XXXX ) to their credit operations team and spoke with XXXX XXXX whom informed me that my earlier account had been revoked. I attempted to explain the situation but she wouldn't hear it. Like before has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 0 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Fast, and the most recent logged activity is Fast forwa, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, I was denied. The reason given was Status of Existing/Prior Account. I called the number provided ( XXXX ) to their credit operations team and spoke with XXXX XXXX whom informed me that my earlier account had been revoked. I attempted to explain the situation but she wouldn't hear it. Like before reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "maybe they go this straightened out on their side and so I completed a prequalification ( reference XXXX ). Despite having perfect credit with a FICO of 750+", and the single most common underlying issue is "no derogatory remarks or collections at all".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating I was denied. The reason given was Status of Existing/Prior Account. I called the number provided ( XXXX ) to their credit operations team and spoke with XXXX XXXX whom informed me that my earlier account had been revoked. I attempted to explain the situation but she wouldn't hear it. Like before: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
I was denied. The reason given was Status of Existing/Prior Account. I called the number provided ( XXXX ) to their credit operations team and spoke with XXXX XXXX whom informed me that my earlier account had been revoked. I attempted to explain the situation but she wouldn't hear it. Like before has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
I was denied. The reason given was Status of Existing/Prior Account. I called the number provided ( XXXX ) to their credit operations team and spoke with XXXX XXXX whom informed me that my earlier account had been revoked. I attempted to explain the situation but she wouldn't hear it. Like before has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against I was denied. The reason given was Status of Existing/Prior Account. I called the number provided ( XXXX ) to their credit operations team and spoke with XXXX XXXX whom informed me that my earlier account had been revoked. I attempted to explain the situation but she wouldn't hear it. Like before is "no derogatory remarks or collections at all" in the "maybe they go this straightened out on their side and so I completed a prequalification ( reference XXXX ). Despite having perfect credit with a FICO of 750+" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.