I was again required to submit a new Request for Loan Modification. In approximately 2 weeks I was notified by XXXX XXXX that Chase had reviewed the wrap option and denied the request. In each case of seeming delay

What the CFPB Record Shows About I was again required to submit a new Request for Loan Modification. In approximately 2 weeks I was notified by XXXX XXXX that Chase had reviewed the wrap option and denied the request. In each case of seeming delay

I was again required to submit a new Request for Loan Modification. In approximately 2 weeks I was notified by XXXX XXXX that Chase had reviewed the wrap option and denied the request. In each case of seeming delay has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Afte, and the most recent logged activity is After seve, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, I was again required to submit a new Request for Loan Modification. In approximately 2 weeks I was notified by XXXX XXXX that Chase had reviewed the wrap option and denied the request. In each case of seeming delay reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I was told by a Chase representative on XXXX XXXX foreclosure team that the payment plan ( that I entered into and was paying at their suggestion ) was insufficient. I was told that Chase policy would not permit a modification with an outstanding lien against the property. The foreclosure was active again. A Chase representative suggested that I speak to someone at HUD/FHA regarding the XXXX problem. The FHA Modification office in California notified me", and the single most common underlying issue is "that Chase could".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating I was again required to submit a new Request for Loan Modification. In approximately 2 weeks I was notified by XXXX XXXX that Chase had reviewed the wrap option and denied the request. In each case of seeming delay: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.