Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows I was advised that even though Chase knew I did not receive the funds twiceXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX told them to remove the funds from my account because the check had been deposited twice and Chase had no choice but to do what XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX said . They further advised that I should contact the maker of the check to tell him to file a complaint to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX for an unauthorised presentation of the check XX/XX/XXXX and to verify that I was not the recipient of the funds of the second presentation.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since On X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How I was advised that even though Chase knew I did not receive the funds twiceXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX told them to remove the funds from my account because the check had been deposited twice and Chase had no choice but to do what XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX said . They further advised that I should contact the maker of the check to tell him to file a complaint to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX for an unauthorised presentation of the check XX/XX/XXXX and to verify that I was not the recipient of the funds of the second presentation.'s 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Chase debited my account by the amount of the check in question with the following explanation : Debit for {$930.00} | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and again on XX/XX/XXXX. Our reference number XXXX | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
I was advised that even though Chase knew I did not receive the funds twiceXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX told them to remove the funds from my account because the check had been deposited twice and Chase had no choice but to do what XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX said . They further advised that I should contact the maker of the check to tell him to file a complaint to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX for an unauthorised presentation of the check XX/XX/XXXX and to verify that I was not the recipient of the funds of the second presentation. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to On X, and the most recent logged activity is On XX/XX/X, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, I was advised that even though Chase knew I did not receive the funds twiceXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX told them to remove the funds from my account because the check had been deposited twice and Chase had no choice but to do what XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX said . They further advised that I should contact the maker of the check to tell him to file a complaint to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX for an unauthorised presentation of the check XX/XX/XXXX and to verify that I was not the recipient of the funds of the second presentation. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "Chase debited my account by the amount of the check in question with the following explanation : Debit for {$930.00}", and the single most common underlying issue is "and again on XX/XX/XXXX. Our reference number XXXX".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating I was advised that even though Chase knew I did not receive the funds twiceXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX told them to remove the funds from my account because the check had been deposited twice and Chase had no choice but to do what XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX said . They further advised that I should contact the maker of the check to tell him to file a complaint to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX for an unauthorised presentation of the check XX/XX/XXXX and to verify that I was not the recipient of the funds of the second presentation.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
I was advised that even though Chase knew I did not receive the funds twiceXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX told them to remove the funds from my account because the check had been deposited twice and Chase had no choice but to do what XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX said . They further advised that I should contact the maker of the check to tell him to file a complaint to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX for an unauthorised presentation of the check XX/XX/XXXX and to verify that I was not the recipient of the funds of the second presentation. has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
I was advised that even though Chase knew I did not receive the funds twiceXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX told them to remove the funds from my account because the check had been deposited twice and Chase had no choice but to do what XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX said . They further advised that I should contact the maker of the check to tell him to file a complaint to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX for an unauthorised presentation of the check XX/XX/XXXX and to verify that I was not the recipient of the funds of the second presentation. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against I was advised that even though Chase knew I did not receive the funds twiceXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX told them to remove the funds from my account because the check had been deposited twice and Chase had no choice but to do what XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX said . They further advised that I should contact the maker of the check to tell him to file a complaint to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX for an unauthorised presentation of the check XX/XX/XXXX and to verify that I was not the recipient of the funds of the second presentation. is "and again on XX/XX/XXXX. Our reference number XXXX" in the "Chase debited my account by the amount of the check in question with the following explanation : Debit for {$930.00}" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.