Total complaints
1
Filed since XX/X
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows I knew that charge-offs's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since XX/X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since XX/X
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How I knew that charge-offs's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I submitted to SLS an RMA application seeking a short negotiated payoff ( charge-off ). On XX/XX/2018 | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| its definition | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and the application status updated to complete. ( SLS did not meet regulatory guidelines by failing to provide written notices as well as requests to have this confirmation in writing ) XX/XX/2018 | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
I knew that charge-offs has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XX/X, and the most recent logged activity is XX/XX/2018, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, I knew that charge-offs reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I submitted to SLS an RMA application seeking a short negotiated payoff ( charge-off ). On XX/XX/2018", and the single most common underlying issue is "and the application status updated to complete. ( SLS did not meet regulatory guidelines by failing to provide written notices as well as requests to have this confirmation in writing ) XX/XX/2018".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating I knew that charge-offs: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
I knew that charge-offs has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
I knew that charge-offs has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against I knew that charge-offs is "and the application status updated to complete. ( SLS did not meet regulatory guidelines by failing to provide written notices as well as requests to have this confirmation in writing ) XX/XX/2018" in the "I submitted to SLS an RMA application seeking a short negotiated payoff ( charge-off ). On XX/XX/2018" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.