Total complaints
1
Filed since Upon
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows I feel this deal shouldn't have been done because it is evident that the finance manager manipulated the numbers to make the sale work in their favor and a set-up for failure for me. On the contract's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Upon. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Upon
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How I feel this deal shouldn't have been done because it is evident that the finance manager manipulated the numbers to make the sale work in their favor and a set-up for failure for me. On the contract's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I found that I have paid a total of {$39000.00} | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| it listed a manufacturer rebate of {$1500.00} and {$2000.00} paid in cash. That was fraudulent information. I was never offered a Manufacturer Rebate of {$1500.00} nor did I pay {$2000.00} in cash as its mentioned on the contract. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| while {$29000.00} went towards interest. I also have an outstanding late fee balance of {$1500.00}. I've also called and sent two emails to XXXX XXXX at Regional Acceptance Corp twice ( XX/XX/XXXX | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
I feel this deal shouldn't have been done because it is evident that the finance manager manipulated the numbers to make the sale work in their favor and a set-up for failure for me. On the contract has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Upon, and the most recent logged activity is Upon revie, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, I feel this deal shouldn't have been done because it is evident that the finance manager manipulated the numbers to make the sale work in their favor and a set-up for failure for me. On the contract reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I found that I have paid a total of {$39000.00}", and the single most common underlying issue is "while {$29000.00} went towards interest. I also have an outstanding late fee balance of {$1500.00}. I've also called and sent two emails to XXXX XXXX at Regional Acceptance Corp twice ( XX/XX/XXXX".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating I feel this deal shouldn't have been done because it is evident that the finance manager manipulated the numbers to make the sale work in their favor and a set-up for failure for me. On the contract: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
I feel this deal shouldn't have been done because it is evident that the finance manager manipulated the numbers to make the sale work in their favor and a set-up for failure for me. On the contract has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
I feel this deal shouldn't have been done because it is evident that the finance manager manipulated the numbers to make the sale work in their favor and a set-up for failure for me. On the contract has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against I feel this deal shouldn't have been done because it is evident that the finance manager manipulated the numbers to make the sale work in their favor and a set-up for failure for me. On the contract is "while {$29000.00} went towards interest. I also have an outstanding late fee balance of {$1500.00}. I've also called and sent two emails to XXXX XXXX at Regional Acceptance Corp twice ( XX/XX/XXXX" in the "I found that I have paid a total of {$39000.00}" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.