Total complaints
23
Filed since 5. T
23 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
23 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows i.e.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 23 consumers have filed complaints since 5. T. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
23
Filed since 5. T
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How i.e.'s 23 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| convincing evidence of falsity is required. Other privileges may be asserted in defense of an allegation of defamation | 3 |
| allegations and arguments presented in the case XXXX | 2 |
| was not subsequently disputed as a result of returned | 1 |
| I was denied access to my personal credit | 1 |
| XXXX | 1 |
| I spoke with Fifth Third Bank 's customer service representative who explained that Fifth Third Bank had become the new lender | 1 |
| I spoke with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX customer service representative who explained that XXXX XXXX XXXX had become the new lender | 1 |
| I spoke with XXXX XXXX Bank 's customer service representative who explained that XXXX XXXX Bank had become the new lender | 1 |
| XX/XX/XXXX | 1 |
| I spoke with XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX customer service representative who explained that XXXX XXXX XXXX had become the new lender | 1 |
| but not for an indefinite period. And | 1 |
| and spoke with the XXXX Georgia Truist Branch Customer Service Representative | 1 |
| practices | 1 |
| PenFed 's collection manager sent me a letter indicating their intention to dispose of my negotiable instrument/commercial paper | 1 |
| D R Horton agents only claimed that another buyer was involved after I started asking questions about their process and their lack of notice to me. On XXXX | 1 |
| XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| tried to transfer {$8000.00} on line to the linked bank account. It was reversed. This happened four times. Each time XXXX called | 1 |
| Inc replied : The consumer states the account was paid to the original creditor on XX/XX/XXXX. The consumer also states she does not owe past-due rents and requests Hunter Warfield for tradeline deletion. XXXX XXXX referred an account to Hunter Warfield for collection on XX/XX/XXXX | 1 |
| VP Guest Services | 1 |
| XXXX XXXX revoke all securities interest that WELLSFARGO CARD SERVICES has taking. This is ORDER to use XXXX accountant system for my refund of my funds to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| {$5100.00}. Since then | 4 |
| knowledge of falsity or with reckless disregard of whether false or not. In contrast | 3 |
| name of the trust and identification of the jurisdiction under which the alleged trust was organized or created. | 2 |
| competent evidence that I had some contractual obligation sans consumer protection encumbrance which incurred the original claims associated with this trade line during any and all claimed time periods. | 1 |
| a trust asset as per section XXXX. | 1 |
| until XX/XX/XXXX | 1 |
| buried beneath all of this information : Summary | 1 |
| for the XXXX of the month when it should have been set up for the XXXX of the month when my payment was due ( Exs. 4a- 7 ). However | 1 |
| name | 1 |
| a refund. This would avoid discriminating against me because of my XXXX and would not fundamentally alter the nature of their service | 1 |
| custodianship holding consumer 's dividends for safe-keeping. Their membership agreement also states that under the Master Account ( that they created on my behalf that I don't have access to ) | 1 |
| SS Statement and Drivers License to XXXX Mortgage. At XXXX | 1 |
| account number : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. I made this request over the telephone with XXXX | 1 |
| she was not allowed to tell us why the wire transfer was cancelled; admitted the wording under the FAQs was vague and that it was at Marcus 's discretion whether to do a wire transfer. We asked for a higher-level supervisor and was told she was the highest supervisor to handle things by phone and that we would have to submit an on-line complaint. We asked for her boss to speak to and she basically said the buck stops with her on phone complaints. On XX/XX/XXXX we attempted to start withdrawing money and it is now XX/XX/XXXX and not a XXXX has been able to be transferred | 1 |
| error in reporting | 1 |
| service not provided | 1 |
| law | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| as a result | 4 |
| but not limited to | 3 |
| please produce at trial any and all documents comprising a trust agreement | 2 |
| or recalled consumer products | 1 |
| made in accordance with the procedures outlined in XXXX CFR Subchapter A part XXXX. According to your prospectus report | 1 |
| extended the XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Initial Plan by an additional 90 days | 1 |
| and I see that I have acquired a surprise interest charge of {$2.00}. No | 1 |
| you have to reinstate the transfer all over again. When | 1 |
| who pulled up the account and stated the money had been deposited into an account that was not mine. He said the name and account number were similar but they did not match my account. I followed up with a Truist Client Resolution representative from XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX who stated it could not be determined who the money was intended for ; therefore | 1 |
| unless the public entity can demonstrate that making the modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the service | 1 |
| the debt is discharged. PenFed 's is in Dishonor | 1 |
| I noted that my DHI Mortgage application was still pending. This was too quick | 1 |
| United States of America Ph. XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX Email : XXXX XXXX TO : XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX Hardcopy to Follow Page XXXX of XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Direct Express Master Card XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| we initiated closing the account to put the funds back into XXXX XXXX. We were told we could set up a wire transfer over the phone and did so on a Friday. We were told all was good. Then we called again on the following Monday and was told the wire transfer could not be made because it had to go back into the same account it came from WHICH WAS ALREADY CLOSED. After MANY annoying/frustrating phone calls | 1 |
| listing the principal amount due of {$2700.00}. The initial collection letter was sent to the consumer on XX/XX/XXXX. The consumers dispute was reviewed with our client XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX. Hunter Warfield was advised the consumer was charged only for fees listed in her lease agreement. Also | 1 |
| XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| Florida XXXX. ALL ACCOUNTS ARE PREPAID Senate document NO.43 | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
i.e. has accumulated 23 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 17 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 23 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to 5. T, and the most recent logged activity is [ XXXX ] O, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, i.e. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "convincing evidence of falsity is required. Other privileges may be asserted in defense of an allegation of defamation", and the single most common underlying issue is "as a result".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating i.e.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
i.e. has received 23 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
i.e. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against i.e. is "as a result" in the "convincing evidence of falsity is required. Other privileges may be asserted in defense of an allegation of defamation" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.