Total complaints
1
Filed since Mass
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows I demand : Immediate removal of all late payment notations from this account Correction of payment history to reflect actual 100 % on-time payment record Standardization of account information across all three bureaus Investigation records showing how these contradictions occurred Audit logs of all previous disputes and investigations Identity of all parties who verified this contradictory information Documentation of procedures used to verify accuracy Evidence of FCRA compliance measures Copies of all communications with the furnisher Written confirmation of removal from all three bureaus CONSUMER IMPACT : These violations have caused : Direct credit score damage from contradictory reporting Denial of accurate credit file access under FCRA 1681g Violation of Massachusetts consumer protection rights Ongoing harm from mixed file reporting Under FCRA 1681n and 1681o's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Mass. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Mass
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How I demand : Immediate removal of all late payment notations from this account Correction of payment history to reflect actual 100 % on-time payment record Standardization of account information across all three bureaus Investigation records showing how these contradictions occurred Audit logs of all previous disputes and investigations Identity of all parties who verified this contradictory information Documentation of procedures used to verify accuracy Evidence of FCRA compliance measures Copies of all communications with the furnisher Written confirmation of removal from all three bureaus CONSUMER IMPACT : These violations have caused : Direct credit score damage from contradictory reporting Denial of accurate credit file access under FCRA 1681g Violation of Massachusetts consumer protection rights Ongoing harm from mixed file reporting Under FCRA 1681n and 1681o's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| these contradictions constitute per se violations requiring removal as : No reasonable procedure could produce these contradictions The accuracy requirement can not be met with contradictory data Mixed file indicators trigger mandatory investigation and removal Pattern and Practice of Systemic Failures : The multiple contradictions across all three bureaus demonstrate : Violation of CFPB XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| 1681e ( b ) | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
I demand : Immediate removal of all late payment notations from this account Correction of payment history to reflect actual 100 % on-time payment record Standardization of account information across all three bureaus Investigation records showing how these contradictions occurred Audit logs of all previous disputes and investigations Identity of all parties who verified this contradictory information Documentation of procedures used to verify accuracy Evidence of FCRA compliance measures Copies of all communications with the furnisher Written confirmation of removal from all three bureaus CONSUMER IMPACT : These violations have caused : Direct credit score damage from contradictory reporting Denial of accurate credit file access under FCRA 1681g Violation of Massachusetts consumer protection rights Ongoing harm from mixed file reporting Under FCRA 1681n and 1681o has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Mass, and the most recent logged activity is Massachuse, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, I demand : Immediate removal of all late payment notations from this account Correction of payment history to reflect actual 100 % on-time payment record Standardization of account information across all three bureaus Investigation records showing how these contradictions occurred Audit logs of all previous disputes and investigations Identity of all parties who verified this contradictory information Documentation of procedures used to verify accuracy Evidence of FCRA compliance measures Copies of all communications with the furnisher Written confirmation of removal from all three bureaus CONSUMER IMPACT : These violations have caused : Direct credit score damage from contradictory reporting Denial of accurate credit file access under FCRA 1681g Violation of Massachusetts consumer protection rights Ongoing harm from mixed file reporting Under FCRA 1681n and 1681o reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "these contradictions constitute per se violations requiring removal as : No reasonable procedure could produce these contradictions The accuracy requirement can not be met with contradictory data Mixed file indicators trigger mandatory investigation and removal Pattern and Practice of Systemic Failures : The multiple contradictions across all three bureaus demonstrate : Violation of CFPB XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "1681e ( b )".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating I demand : Immediate removal of all late payment notations from this account Correction of payment history to reflect actual 100 % on-time payment record Standardization of account information across all three bureaus Investigation records showing how these contradictions occurred Audit logs of all previous disputes and investigations Identity of all parties who verified this contradictory information Documentation of procedures used to verify accuracy Evidence of FCRA compliance measures Copies of all communications with the furnisher Written confirmation of removal from all three bureaus CONSUMER IMPACT : These violations have caused : Direct credit score damage from contradictory reporting Denial of accurate credit file access under FCRA 1681g Violation of Massachusetts consumer protection rights Ongoing harm from mixed file reporting Under FCRA 1681n and 1681o: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
I demand : Immediate removal of all late payment notations from this account Correction of payment history to reflect actual 100 % on-time payment record Standardization of account information across all three bureaus Investigation records showing how these contradictions occurred Audit logs of all previous disputes and investigations Identity of all parties who verified this contradictory information Documentation of procedures used to verify accuracy Evidence of FCRA compliance measures Copies of all communications with the furnisher Written confirmation of removal from all three bureaus CONSUMER IMPACT : These violations have caused : Direct credit score damage from contradictory reporting Denial of accurate credit file access under FCRA 1681g Violation of Massachusetts consumer protection rights Ongoing harm from mixed file reporting Under FCRA 1681n and 1681o has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
I demand : Immediate removal of all late payment notations from this account Correction of payment history to reflect actual 100 % on-time payment record Standardization of account information across all three bureaus Investigation records showing how these contradictions occurred Audit logs of all previous disputes and investigations Identity of all parties who verified this contradictory information Documentation of procedures used to verify accuracy Evidence of FCRA compliance measures Copies of all communications with the furnisher Written confirmation of removal from all three bureaus CONSUMER IMPACT : These violations have caused : Direct credit score damage from contradictory reporting Denial of accurate credit file access under FCRA 1681g Violation of Massachusetts consumer protection rights Ongoing harm from mixed file reporting Under FCRA 1681n and 1681o has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against I demand : Immediate removal of all late payment notations from this account Correction of payment history to reflect actual 100 % on-time payment record Standardization of account information across all three bureaus Investigation records showing how these contradictions occurred Audit logs of all previous disputes and investigations Identity of all parties who verified this contradictory information Documentation of procedures used to verify accuracy Evidence of FCRA compliance measures Copies of all communications with the furnisher Written confirmation of removal from all three bureaus CONSUMER IMPACT : These violations have caused : Direct credit score damage from contradictory reporting Denial of accurate credit file access under FCRA 1681g Violation of Massachusetts consumer protection rights Ongoing harm from mixed file reporting Under FCRA 1681n and 1681o is "1681e ( b )" in the "these contradictions constitute per se violations requiring removal as : No reasonable procedure could produce these contradictions The accuracy requirement can not be met with contradictory data Mixed file indicators trigger mandatory investigation and removal Pattern and Practice of Systemic Failures : The multiple contradictions across all three bureaus demonstrate : Violation of CFPB XXXX XXXX" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.