Total complaints
1
Filed since ___
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since ___ . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
___
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case complaint mix by product
- I mailed 1 100.0% – 0% relief
How I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I mailed to XXXX a demand letter pursuant to Chapter 93A of the Mass. Consumer Protection Act. My demand letter advised XXXX that they violated the MCA because they are not licensed to collect debts in my state | 1 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| where the court ruled as follows : XXXX is at least the nominal reporter of XXXX debt to three national credit reporting agencies. Accordingly | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| where the court ruled that XXXX is simply a passive debt buyer because it only hires licensed debt collectors on its behalf | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case
I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to ___ , and the most recent logged activity is ___ On XX/, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I mailed to XXXX a demand letter pursuant to Chapter 93A of the Mass. Consumer Protection Act. My demand letter advised XXXX that they violated the MCA because they are not licensed to collect debts in my state", and the single most common underlying issue is "where the court ruled that XXXX is simply a passive debt buyer because it only hires licensed debt collectors on its behalf".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case have?
I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case respond to complaints on time?
I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case?
The most common issue reported against I cited three cases and one opinion letter from the FTC to support this. The most relevant case on point is a decision that was made in Massachusetts just months prior to the XXXX case is "where the court ruled that XXXX is simply a passive debt buyer because it only hires licensed debt collectors on its behalf" in the "I mailed to XXXX a demand letter pursuant to Chapter 93A of the Mass. Consumer Protection Act. My demand letter advised XXXX that they violated the MCA because they are not licensed to collect debts in my state" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
