I called Bank of America back where I finally got transferred to someone who is understanding of the situation and filed an investigation on my behalf. He informed me that he doesn't know why they told the senior banker at the branch that it was because of suspicious activity or fraud and that it was incorrect ; it was based on a credit revoke. He goes to the file for me. This all happened on XX/XX/XXXX.

What the CFPB Record Shows About I called Bank of America back where I finally got transferred to someone who is understanding of the situation and filed an investigation on my behalf. He informed me that he doesn't know why they told the senior banker at the branch that it was because of suspicious activity or fraud and that it was incorrect ; it was based on a credit revoke. He goes to the file for me. This all happened on XX/XX/XXXX.

I called Bank of America back where I finally got transferred to someone who is understanding of the situation and filed an investigation on my behalf. He informed me that he doesn't know why they told the senior banker at the branch that it was because of suspicious activity or fraud and that it was incorrect ; it was based on a credit revoke. He goes to the file for me. This all happened on XX/XX/XXXX. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Upon, and the most recent logged activity is Upon leavi, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, I called Bank of America back where I finally got transferred to someone who is understanding of the situation and filed an investigation on my behalf. He informed me that he doesn't know why they told the senior banker at the branch that it was because of suspicious activity or fraud and that it was incorrect ; it was based on a credit revoke. He goes to the file for me. This all happened on XX/XX/XXXX. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I called XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "and even in the last month".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating I called Bank of America back where I finally got transferred to someone who is understanding of the situation and filed an investigation on my behalf. He informed me that he doesn't know why they told the senior banker at the branch that it was because of suspicious activity or fraud and that it was incorrect ; it was based on a credit revoke. He goes to the file for me. This all happened on XX/XX/XXXX.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.