Total complaints
3
Filed since 5 )
3 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
3 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows HUD's complaint history from CFPB public records. 3 consumers have filed complaints since 5 ) . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
3
Filed since 5 )
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How HUD's 3 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| in which an error by SPS on the Comps of the XXXX XXXX Subdivision versus the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Subdivision. There is a {$700.00} per month to {$800.00} per month increase difference in property value. That is a 45K-100K upgrade property difference between XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Sub division and XXXX XXXX XXXX Sub division. SPS Hardships forms were submitted on XX/XX/2019. The Trial Modification Plan amount was XXXX. The currents payment was XXXX. That was a Payment increase of {$190.00} per Month on the Loan Modification amount. The Modification is intended to help American but the payment increased. Corrected Comps and a Right to Appeal in The XXXX XXXX Subdivision and Arkansas XXXX County City Property Card for Parcel XXXX Loan # XXXX were submitted again on XX/XX/2019. The Error is Comps on a higher price Subdivision like XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Subdivision versus the XXXX XXXX Subdivision in which SPS took. Also enclosed is the State of Arkansas property value of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Ar XXXX in the XXXX XXXX Subdivision and Comp for the Subdivision. Consider this Right to Appeal document submitted on the XX/XX/2019. Finally income change state of Arkansas Garnishment XX/XX/2019 ( See addition forms enclosed in this Right to Appeal Document ). Also | 1 |
| physical copies of a full and complete financial packet of my income for the entire years of XXXX & XXXX | 1 |
| in which an error by SPS on the Comps of the XXXX XXXX Subdivision versus the Village of the XXXX Subdivision. There is a {$700.00} per month to {$800.00} per month increase difference in property value. That is a XXXX-XXXX upgrade property difference between The Village of XXXX Sub division and The XXXX XXXX Sub division. SPS Hardships forms were submitted on XX/XX/XXXX. The Trial Modification Plan amount was XXXX. The currents payment was XXXX. That was a Payment increase of {$190.00} per Month on the Loan Modification amount. The Modification is intended to help American but the payment increased. Corrected Comps and a Right to Appeal in The XXXX XXXX Subdivision and Arkansas XXXX County City Property Card for XXXX XXXX Loan # XXXX were submitted again on XX/XX/XXXX. The Error is Comps on a higher price Subdivision like The Village of the XXXX Subdivision versus the XXXX XXXX Subdivision in which SPS took. Also enclosed is the State of Arkansas property value in the XXXX XXXX XXXX and Comp for the Subdivision. Consider this Right to Appeal document submitted on the 9th day of XX/XX/XXXX. Finally income change state of Arkansas Garnishment XX/XX/XXXX ( See addition forms enclosed in this Right to Appeal Document ). Also | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and the Federal Reserve | 1 |
| FHA | 1 |
| and the Federal Reserve | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| as well as the bankruptcy Court but SPS continued to charge for Escrow ( Taxes and Insurance ) {$400.00} and now {$1100.00}. You have yet to respond in writing to our documents. This information and all documents are being forwarded to CFPB | 2 |
| my bank account history for the year of XXXX | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
HUD has accumulated 3 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 3 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 3 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to 5 ) , and the most recent logged activity is Included i, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, HUD reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "in which an error by SPS on the Comps of the XXXX XXXX Subdivision versus the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Subdivision. There is a {$700.00} per month to {$800.00} per month increase difference in property value. That is a 45K-100K upgrade property difference between XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Sub division and XXXX XXXX XXXX Sub division. SPS Hardships forms were submitted on XX/XX/2019. The Trial Modification Plan amount was XXXX. The currents payment was XXXX. That was a Payment increase of {$190.00} per Month on the Loan Modification amount. The Modification is intended to help American but the payment increased. Corrected Comps and a Right to Appeal in The XXXX XXXX Subdivision and Arkansas XXXX County City Property Card for Parcel XXXX Loan # XXXX were submitted again on XX/XX/2019. The Error is Comps on a higher price Subdivision like XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Subdivision versus the XXXX XXXX Subdivision in which SPS took. Also enclosed is the State of Arkansas property value of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Ar XXXX in the XXXX XXXX Subdivision and Comp for the Subdivision. Consider this Right to Appeal document submitted on the XX/XX/2019. Finally income change state of Arkansas Garnishment XX/XX/2019 ( See addition forms enclosed in this Right to Appeal Document ). Also", and the single most common underlying issue is "as well as the bankruptcy Court but SPS continued to charge for Escrow ( Taxes and Insurance ) {$400.00} and now {$1100.00}. You have yet to respond in writing to our documents. This information and all documents are being forwarded to CFPB".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating HUD: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
HUD has received 3 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
HUD has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against HUD is "as well as the bankruptcy Court but SPS continued to charge for Escrow ( Taxes and Insurance ) {$400.00} and now {$1100.00}. You have yet to respond in writing to our documents. This information and all documents are being forwarded to CFPB" in the "in which an error by SPS on the Comps of the XXXX XXXX Subdivision versus the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Subdivision. There is a {$700.00} per month to {$800.00} per month increase difference in property value. That is a 45K-100K upgrade property difference between XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Sub division and XXXX XXXX XXXX Sub division. SPS Hardships forms were submitted on XX/XX/2019. The Trial Modification Plan amount was XXXX. The currents payment was XXXX. That was a Payment increase of {$190.00} per Month on the Loan Modification amount. The Modification is intended to help American but the payment increased. Corrected Comps and a Right to Appeal in The XXXX XXXX Subdivision and Arkansas XXXX County City Property Card for Parcel XXXX Loan # XXXX were submitted again on XX/XX/2019. The Error is Comps on a higher price Subdivision like XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Subdivision versus the XXXX XXXX Subdivision in which SPS took. Also enclosed is the State of Arkansas property value of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Ar XXXX in the XXXX XXXX Subdivision and Comp for the Subdivision. Consider this Right to Appeal document submitted on the XX/XX/2019. Finally income change state of Arkansas Garnishment XX/XX/2019 ( See addition forms enclosed in this Right to Appeal Document ). Also" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.