Total complaints
3
Filed since Cons
3 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
3 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows her Lawyer Insisted to the Judge through Direct Testimony's complaint history from CFPB public records. 3 consumers have filed complaints since Cons. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
3
Filed since Cons
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How her Lawyer Insisted to the Judge through Direct Testimony's 3 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| but bought by XXXX. Again | 2 |
| but bought by NationStar. Again | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| that XXXXXXXX XXXX at that time would Indeed Remove my name from the Mortgage after the Loan Modification took place after a few months. They Insisted to the Judge that in order to begin Processing the Loan Modification XXXX XXXX Required a Hardship Condition { the Final Divorce Decree } AND ALSO THE PRO-QUIT CLAIM DEED to be signed. The Judge listened to my concerns and made a comment similar to ... { XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| that XXXXXXXX XXXX at that time would Indeed Remove my name from the Mortgage after the Loan Modification took place after a few months. They Insisted to the Judge that in order to begin Processing the Loan Modification XXXX XXXX Required a Hardship Condition { the Final Divorce Decree } AND ALSO THE PRO-QUIT CLAIM DEED to be signed. The Judge listened to my concerns and made a comment similar to ... { XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| that XXXX XXXX at that time would Indeed Remove my name from the Mortgage after the Loan Modification took place after a few months. They Insisted to the Judge that in order to begin Processing the Loan Modification XXXX XXXX Required a Hardship Condition { the Final Divorce Decree } AND ALSO THE PRO-QUIT CLAIM DEED to be signed. The Judge listened to my concerns and made a comment similar to ... { XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| where Transcripts can be heard or reviewed if CFPB pursues this. My x-Wife and myself were living in seperate residencies since XX/XX/XXXX. I specifically mentioned to the Judge that I did not want to sign the pro-quit claim deed | 2 |
| where Transcripts can be heard or reviewed if CFPB pursues this. My x-Wife and myself were living in seperate residencies since XXXX XXXX. I specifically mentioned to the Judge that I did not want to sign the pro-quit claim deed | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
her Lawyer Insisted to the Judge through Direct Testimony has accumulated 3 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 3 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 3 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Cons, and the most recent logged activity is Consumer d, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, her Lawyer Insisted to the Judge through Direct Testimony reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "but bought by XXXX. Again", and the single most common underlying issue is "where Transcripts can be heard or reviewed if CFPB pursues this. My x-Wife and myself were living in seperate residencies since XX/XX/XXXX. I specifically mentioned to the Judge that I did not want to sign the pro-quit claim deed".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating her Lawyer Insisted to the Judge through Direct Testimony: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
her Lawyer Insisted to the Judge through Direct Testimony has received 3 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
her Lawyer Insisted to the Judge through Direct Testimony has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against her Lawyer Insisted to the Judge through Direct Testimony is "where Transcripts can be heard or reviewed if CFPB pursues this. My x-Wife and myself were living in seperate residencies since XX/XX/XXXX. I specifically mentioned to the Judge that I did not want to sign the pro-quit claim deed" in the "but bought by XXXX. Again" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.