2026 data Public-data reference. official source

her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since XXXX. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
XXXX
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since XXXX

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). Unbeknownst to: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% Unbeknownst to 100.0%
  • Unbeknownst to 1 100.0% 0% relief

How her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
Unbeknownst to XXXX. XXXX/XXXX/XXXX : XXXX and her authorize 3rd party call SP Servicing to get details of the Final Modification so she could sign the documents and mail back. She is told the modification was cancelled and home was in process of Short Sale. She realized she was being defrauded by the agents and cancels the short sale process and demands her modification be validated. She plead with SP Servicing and explained she did n't request the cancellation of her modification for which she had been struggling to get approved for months. They refused to help. She reapplied 1

Top States

State Complaints
and work with the homeowner 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
but to sale her home. She listed with a new agent. The previous agent and previous buyer sued stating they had a Right of First Refusal to purchase the property at previous accorded price and with the same agents. This prevented her from closing on the offer she had currently accepted. She hires an attorney to combat these 3rd parties claiming interest in her property. Select Portfolio is aware of her legal battle and on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX XXXX from SP Servicing confirmed the account would be placed on a forbearance status to allow XXXX to clear the legal issues which would n't be long so she could close escrow and result with a much bigger gain then in a foreclosure. The sale would pay off all liens on the property and afford her with some money to live off of. XXXX/XXXX/XXXX : XXXX XXXX 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates

her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XXXX, and the most recent logged activity is XXXX/XXXX/, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "Unbeknownst to XXXX. XXXX/XXXX/XXXX : XXXX and her authorize 3rd party call SP Servicing to get details of the Final Modification so she could sign the documents and mail back. She is told the modification was cancelled and home was in process of Short Sale. She realized she was being defrauded by the agents and cancels the short sale process and demands her modification be validated. She plead with SP Servicing and explained she did n't request the cancellation of her modification for which she had been struggling to get approved for months. They refused to help. She reapplied", and the single most common underlying issue is "but to sale her home. She listed with a new agent. The previous agent and previous buyer sued stating they had a Right of First Refusal to purchase the property at previous accorded price and with the same agents. This prevented her from closing on the offer she had currently accepted. She hires an attorney to combat these 3rd parties claiming interest in her property. Select Portfolio is aware of her legal battle and on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX XXXX from SP Servicing confirmed the account would be placed on a forbearance status to allow XXXX to clear the legal issues which would n't be long so she could close escrow and result with a much bigger gain then in a foreclosure. The sale would pay off all liens on the property and afford her with some money to live off of. XXXX/XXXX/XXXX : XXXX XXXX".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates have?

her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates respond to complaints on time?

her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates?

The most common issue reported against her 3rd party was told they would postpone additional sale dates is "but to sale her home. She listed with a new agent. The previous agent and previous buyer sued stating they had a Right of First Refusal to purchase the property at previous accorded price and with the same agents. This prevented her from closing on the offer she had currently accepted. She hires an attorney to combat these 3rd parties claiming interest in her property. Select Portfolio is aware of her legal battle and on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX XXXX from SP Servicing confirmed the account would be placed on a forbearance status to allow XXXX to clear the legal issues which would n't be long so she could close escrow and result with a much bigger gain then in a foreclosure. The sale would pay off all liens on the property and afford her with some money to live off of. XXXX/XXXX/XXXX : XXXX XXXX" in the "Unbeknownst to XXXX. XXXX/XXXX/XXXX : XXXX and her authorize 3rd party call SP Servicing to get details of the Final Modification so she could sign the documents and mail back. She is told the modification was cancelled and home was in process of Short Sale. She realized she was being defrauded by the agents and cancels the short sale process and demands her modification be validated. She plead with SP Servicing and explained she did n't request the cancellation of her modification for which she had been struggling to get approved for months. They refused to help. She reapplied" product category.

Related