2026 data Public-data reference. official source

he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since In X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
In X
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since In X

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). I was: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% I was 100.0%
  • I was 1 100.0% 0% relief

How he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
I was able to speak to XXXX XXXX XXXX 1

Top States

State Complaints
and the fees continued to be charged. 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
I indicated that such fees were normally imposed when the party is behind in their payments 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called

he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to In X, and the most recent logged activity is In XX/XX/X, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I was able to speak to XXXX XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "I indicated that such fees were normally imposed when the party is behind in their payments".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called have?

he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called respond to complaints on time?

he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called?

The most common issue reported against he indicated that our payments were being affected via your automated service and are up to date. I explained to him the property was a vacant lot and there should be no need to inspect it for habitation as there is no house on the property. He was not familiar why the fee was being imposed and assured me that he would call me back. He never called is "I indicated that such fees were normally imposed when the party is behind in their payments" in the "I was able to speak to XXXX XXXX XXXX" product category.

Related