Total complaints
1
Filed since I ca
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows had the 3rd party dealership resend the letter specifically taking responsibility for the vehicle and the delinquency's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since I ca. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since I ca
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How had the 3rd party dealership resend the letter specifically taking responsibility for the vehicle and the delinquency's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and requested to have the late payment removed from my file for the month of XXXX. They explained the process | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and now get radio silence from NMAC. Delinquency still shows for the month of XXXX.,,NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC,WA,98021,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2021-04-01,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,4262928 | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| having them send in the letter and a copy of the release of interest. The letter was immediately denied by NMAC as it did not conform with the verbiage '' needed in the letter. I called and spoke with a manager at NMAC about my dilemma | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
had the 3rd party dealership resend the letter specifically taking responsibility for the vehicle and the delinquency has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I ca, and the most recent logged activity is I called u, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, had the 3rd party dealership resend the letter specifically taking responsibility for the vehicle and the delinquency reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "and requested to have the late payment removed from my file for the month of XXXX. They explained the process", and the single most common underlying issue is "having them send in the letter and a copy of the release of interest. The letter was immediately denied by NMAC as it did not conform with the verbiage '' needed in the letter. I called and spoke with a manager at NMAC about my dilemma".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating had the 3rd party dealership resend the letter specifically taking responsibility for the vehicle and the delinquency: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
had the 3rd party dealership resend the letter specifically taking responsibility for the vehicle and the delinquency has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
had the 3rd party dealership resend the letter specifically taking responsibility for the vehicle and the delinquency has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against had the 3rd party dealership resend the letter specifically taking responsibility for the vehicle and the delinquency is "having them send in the letter and a copy of the release of interest. The letter was immediately denied by NMAC as it did not conform with the verbiage '' needed in the letter. I called and spoke with a manager at NMAC about my dilemma" in the "and requested to have the late payment removed from my file for the month of XXXX. They explained the process" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.