Total complaints
3
Filed since This
3 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
3 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows furnisher's complaint history from CFPB public records. 3 consumers have filed complaints since This. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
3
Filed since This
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How furnisher's 3 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| according to my state attorney | 3 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| that was contacted under the FCRA 609 ( a ) ( 2 ) and all 3 companies have failed.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,MS,39157,,Consent provided,Web,2018-12-05,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3092176 | 1 |
| that was contacted under the FCRA 609 ( a ) ( 2 ) and all 3 companies have failed.,,EQUIFAX | 1 |
| that was contacted under the FCRA 609 ( a ) ( 2 ) and all 3 companies have failed.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| ( Mississippi ) this a violation of my privacy laws of the FCRA and identity. XXXX XXXX XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX case shows the judge ruled that the court can not just rely on computer generated documentation. Therefore XXXX XXXX verification or 3rd party is noncompliance and unverifiable | 1 |
| ( Mississippi ) this a violation of my privacy laws of the FCRA and identity. XXXX XXXX XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX court case shows the judge ruled that the court can not just rely on computer generated documentation. Therefore XXXX XXXX verification or 3rd party is noncompliance and unverifiable | 1 |
| ( Mississippi ) this a violation of my privacy laws of the FCRA and identity. XXXX XXXX XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX court case shows the judge ruled that the court can not just rely on computer generated documentation. Therefore XXXX XXXX verification or 3rd party is noncompliance and unverifiable | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
furnisher has accumulated 3 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 3 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 0 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to This, and the most recent logged activity is This is af, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, furnisher reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "according to my state attorney", and the single most common underlying issue is "( Mississippi ) this a violation of my privacy laws of the FCRA and identity. XXXX XXXX XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX case shows the judge ruled that the court can not just rely on computer generated documentation. Therefore XXXX XXXX verification or 3rd party is noncompliance and unverifiable".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating furnisher: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
furnisher has received 3 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
furnisher has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against furnisher is "( Mississippi ) this a violation of my privacy laws of the FCRA and identity. XXXX XXXX XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX case shows the judge ruled that the court can not just rely on computer generated documentation. Therefore XXXX XXXX verification or 3rd party is noncompliance and unverifiable" in the "according to my state attorney" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.