Total complaints
3
Filed since Belo
3 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
3 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows fraud FCRA 605B ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 identity misuse Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX ) Ongoing late payments despite dispute's complaint history from CFPB public records. 3 consumers have filed complaints since Belo. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 66.7% of cases.
Total complaints
3
Filed since Belo
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
66.7%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How fraud FCRA 605B ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 identity misuse Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX ) Ongoing late payments despite dispute's 3 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| false first delinquency dates | 3 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| no validation provided FCRA 611 ; FDCPA 1692e ; Metro2 failure to correct Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) Inaccurate delinquency balance/reporting Same as above Dennis v. BEH1 LLC XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) Fraudulent account I never opened | 3 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| 623 ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 inconsistent payment history/status Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Two late payments reported incorrectly on closed account FCRA 1681e ( b ) ; FDCPA 1692e ; Metro2 rating error Dennis v. BEH1 LLC XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) Collection reported | 3 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
fraud FCRA 605B ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 identity misuse Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX ) Ongoing late payments despite dispute has accumulated 3 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 3 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Belo, and the most recent logged activity is Below is a, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, fraud FCRA 605B ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 identity misuse Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX ) Ongoing late payments despite dispute reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 66.7% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "false first delinquency dates", and the single most common underlying issue is "623 ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 inconsistent payment history/status Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Two late payments reported incorrectly on closed account FCRA 1681e ( b ) ; FDCPA 1692e ; Metro2 rating error Dennis v. BEH1 LLC XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) Collection reported".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating fraud FCRA 605B ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 identity misuse Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX ) Ongoing late payments despite dispute: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
fraud FCRA 605B ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 identity misuse Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX ) Ongoing late payments despite dispute has received 3 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
fraud FCRA 605B ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 identity misuse Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX ) Ongoing late payments despite dispute has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against fraud FCRA 605B ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 identity misuse Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX ) Ongoing late payments despite dispute is "623 ; FDCPA 809 ; Metro2 inconsistent payment history/status Cushman v. Trans Union XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Two late payments reported incorrectly on closed account FCRA 1681e ( b ) ; FDCPA 1692e ; Metro2 rating error Dennis v. BEH1 LLC XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) Collection reported" in the "false first delinquency dates" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.