Total complaints
1
Filed since XX/X
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows even after over 3 months of delay. ) This demonstrates bad-faith non-compliance and a willful disregard of statutory deadlines.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since XX/X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since XX/X
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How even after over 3 months of delay. ) This demonstrates bad-faith non-compliance and a willful disregard of statutory deadlines.'s 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the XX/XX/XXXX letter states I must send a copy of avalid identity theft report from law enforcement or the FTC in order to have the information removed even though Experian was in possession of my FTC Identity Theft Report and supporting police report. This repetitive stalling tactic ( insisting on proper documents already supplied ) caused significant delay. By this time | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| a clear violation of FCRA 605Bs 4-day rule. Experians own records later confirmed that it had all necessary identity theft documentation on file | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
even after over 3 months of delay. ) This demonstrates bad-faith non-compliance and a willful disregard of statutory deadlines. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XX/X, and the most recent logged activity is XX/XX/XXXX, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, even after over 3 months of delay. ) This demonstrates bad-faith non-compliance and a willful disregard of statutory deadlines. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the XX/XX/XXXX letter states I must send a copy of avalid identity theft report from law enforcement or the FTC in order to have the information removed even though Experian was in possession of my FTC Identity Theft Report and supporting police report. This repetitive stalling tactic ( insisting on proper documents already supplied ) caused significant delay. By this time", and the single most common underlying issue is "a clear violation of FCRA 605Bs 4-day rule. Experians own records later confirmed that it had all necessary identity theft documentation on file".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating even after over 3 months of delay. ) This demonstrates bad-faith non-compliance and a willful disregard of statutory deadlines.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
even after over 3 months of delay. ) This demonstrates bad-faith non-compliance and a willful disregard of statutory deadlines. has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
even after over 3 months of delay. ) This demonstrates bad-faith non-compliance and a willful disregard of statutory deadlines. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against even after over 3 months of delay. ) This demonstrates bad-faith non-compliance and a willful disregard of statutory deadlines. is "a clear violation of FCRA 605Bs 4-day rule. Experians own records later confirmed that it had all necessary identity theft documentation on file" in the "the XX/XX/XXXX letter states I must send a copy of avalid identity theft report from law enforcement or the FTC in order to have the information removed even though Experian was in possession of my FTC Identity Theft Report and supporting police report. This repetitive stalling tactic ( insisting on proper documents already supplied ) caused significant delay. By this time" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.