etc. the only explanation I received from the foreclosure company attorney was that there were multiple charges for the same specific line items because there were multiple foreclosures scheduled. That statement from the foreclosure company attorney is incorrect. There was only one foreclosure auction sale scheduled up to that point. Therefore the explanation that multiple charges for the same line items are due to multiple foreclosure dates means that there should be at most - if the specific charge is in fact justified - only one charge per each line item.

What the CFPB Record Shows About etc. the only explanation I received from the foreclosure company attorney was that there were multiple charges for the same specific line items because there were multiple foreclosures scheduled. That statement from the foreclosure company attorney is incorrect. There was only one foreclosure auction sale scheduled up to that point. Therefore the explanation that multiple charges for the same line items are due to multiple foreclosure dates means that there should be at most - if the specific charge is in fact justified - only one charge per each line item.

etc. the only explanation I received from the foreclosure company attorney was that there were multiple charges for the same specific line items because there were multiple foreclosures scheduled. That statement from the foreclosure company attorney is incorrect. There was only one foreclosure auction sale scheduled up to that point. Therefore the explanation that multiple charges for the same line items are due to multiple foreclosure dates means that there should be at most - if the specific charge is in fact justified - only one charge per each line item. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Howe, and the most recent logged activity is However, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, etc. the only explanation I received from the foreclosure company attorney was that there were multiple charges for the same specific line items because there were multiple foreclosures scheduled. That statement from the foreclosure company attorney is incorrect. There was only one foreclosure auction sale scheduled up to that point. Therefore the explanation that multiple charges for the same line items are due to multiple foreclosure dates means that there should be at most - if the specific charge is in fact justified - only one charge per each line item. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "they did not provide any explanation or justification", and the single most common underlying issue is "and instead they established a new foreclosure auction sale date of Monday".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating etc. the only explanation I received from the foreclosure company attorney was that there were multiple charges for the same specific line items because there were multiple foreclosures scheduled. That statement from the foreclosure company attorney is incorrect. There was only one foreclosure auction sale scheduled up to that point. Therefore the explanation that multiple charges for the same line items are due to multiple foreclosure dates means that there should be at most - if the specific charge is in fact justified - only one charge per each line item.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.