Total complaints
1
Filed since In o
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows etc etc. It is our strong belief that we were discriminated against because I work for a competitor bank. We also strongly believe that US Bank violated Regulation C for Mortgage Disclosures's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since In o. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since In o
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How etc etc. It is our strong belief that we were discriminated against because I work for a competitor bank. We also strongly believe that US Bank violated Regulation C for Mortgage Disclosures's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| we dealt with 12 different US Bank employees and spent countless hours on the phone and in person working through their incompetence. It was as if this was the first time they had ever done a home equity loan. The entire process was a 73-day ordeal ( not 7 days as promised ) in which we were continually lied to and/or mislead. We were never given disclosures to explain what was happening or what to expect | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Regulation K for Sales Practices | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| our loan amount was changed ( we were told on one occasion by XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX that our loan was {$23000.00} higher than what we requested ) | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
etc etc. It is our strong belief that we were discriminated against because I work for a competitor bank. We also strongly believe that US Bank violated Regulation C for Mortgage Disclosures has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to In o, and the most recent logged activity is In order t, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, etc etc. It is our strong belief that we were discriminated against because I work for a competitor bank. We also strongly believe that US Bank violated Regulation C for Mortgage Disclosures reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "we dealt with 12 different US Bank employees and spent countless hours on the phone and in person working through their incompetence. It was as if this was the first time they had ever done a home equity loan. The entire process was a 73-day ordeal ( not 7 days as promised ) in which we were continually lied to and/or mislead. We were never given disclosures to explain what was happening or what to expect", and the single most common underlying issue is "our loan amount was changed ( we were told on one occasion by XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX that our loan was {$23000.00} higher than what we requested )".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating etc etc. It is our strong belief that we were discriminated against because I work for a competitor bank. We also strongly believe that US Bank violated Regulation C for Mortgage Disclosures: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
etc etc. It is our strong belief that we were discriminated against because I work for a competitor bank. We also strongly believe that US Bank violated Regulation C for Mortgage Disclosures has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
etc etc. It is our strong belief that we were discriminated against because I work for a competitor bank. We also strongly believe that US Bank violated Regulation C for Mortgage Disclosures has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against etc etc. It is our strong belief that we were discriminated against because I work for a competitor bank. We also strongly believe that US Bank violated Regulation C for Mortgage Disclosures is "our loan amount was changed ( we were told on one occasion by XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX that our loan was {$23000.00} higher than what we requested )" in the "we dealt with 12 different US Bank employees and spent countless hours on the phone and in person working through their incompetence. It was as if this was the first time they had ever done a home equity loan. The entire process was a 73-day ordeal ( not 7 days as promised ) in which we were continually lied to and/or mislead. We were never given disclosures to explain what was happening or what to expect" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.