2026 data Public-data reference. official source

et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Most. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Most
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since Most

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). XXXX: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% XXXX 100.0%
  • XXXX 1 100.0% 0% relief

How et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
XXXX 1

Top States

State Complaints
inaccurate and unwarranted fees for not being able to submit payment ( they had inexplicably canceled my debit card and were unable to re-instate it - XXXX ). I was not able to pay anything - either to BofA or to other vendors. 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
the damages from this unwarranted action this affects my credit rating and reputation etc. 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate

et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Most, and the most recent logged activity is Most recen, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "the damages from this unwarranted action this affects my credit rating and reputation etc.".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate have?

et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate respond to complaints on time?

et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate?

The most common issue reported against et submitted to BofA but apparently that has not been the case B of A is at fault and is in breach of our contract by denying me use of my accounts for approximately 3 years and then unscrupulously charging me duplicate is "the damages from this unwarranted action this affects my credit rating and reputation etc." in the "XXXX" product category.

Related