Total complaints
13
Filed since ( Pu
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715
13 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
13 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715's complaint history from CFPB public records. 13 consumers have filed complaints since ( Pu. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
13
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
( Pu
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715 complaint mix by product
- title VIII 8 61.5% – 0% relief
- they can 1 7.7% – 0% relief
- this account 1 7.7% – 0% relief
- they can 1 7.7% – 0% relief
- this account 1 7.7% – 0% relief
- they can 1 7.7% – 0% relief
How Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715's 13 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| title VIII | 8 |
| they can not confirm my identity of the correct info as they have let whom ever open this account and got service. I have sent in police report and they are suppose to be removing this account off my credit report. I am asking transunion to do their part and remove this account off my credit as it it not mines XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$8500.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX This account belongs to my XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX who ssn is one number different from mys. This individual ( brother ) ssn ends in XXXX mys ( whom is XXXX XXXX ends in XXXX ) but this report is coming up on my report as XXXX XXXX when it should be under XXXX XXXX XXXX. I have contacted the creditor numerous times to get this fixed but they failed to do so. Im asking this account be removed from my report for mix files as my XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX is the one the owner of this account thats reporting I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence | 1 |
| this account belongs to my brother by them of XXXX XXXX who is my XXXX and as we share like names similar ssn number as his ssn is one number different then mines as it is XXXX and my ssn ( XXXX XXXX is XXXX ) I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence | 1 |
| they can not confirm my identity of the correct info as they have let whom ever open this account and got service. I have sent in police report and they are suppose to be removing this account off my credit report. I am asking transunion to do their part and remove this account off my credit as it it not mines XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$8500.00} XX/XX/XXXX This account belongs to my twin brother XXXX XXXX who ssn is XXXX number different from mys. This individual ( brother ) ssn ends in XXXX mys ( whom is XXXX XXXX ends in XXXX ) but this report is coming up on my report as XXXX XXXX when it should be under XXXX XXXX XXXX. I have contacted the creditor numerous times to get this fixed but they failed to do so. Im asking this account be removed from my report for mix files as my twin brother XXXX XXXX is the one the owner of this account thats reporting I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence | 1 |
| this account belongs to my brother by them of XXXX XXXX who is my twin and as we share like names similar ssn number as his ssn is one number different then mines as it is XXXX and my ssn ( XXXX XXXX is XXXX ) I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence | 1 |
| they can not confirm my identity of the correct info as they have let whom ever open this account and got service. I have sent in police report and they are suppose to be removing this account off my credit report. I am asking transunion to do their part and remove this account off my credit as it it not mines Town and country national bank {$8500.00} XX/XX/XXXX This account belongs to my XXXX brother XXXX XXXX who ssn is XXXX number different from mys. This individual ( brother ) ssn ends in XXXX mys ( whom is XXXX XXXX ends in XXXX ) but this report is coming up on my report as XXXX XXXX when it should be under XXXX XXXX XXXX. I have contacted the creditor numerous times to get this fixed but they failed to do so. Im asking this account be removed from my report for mix files as my XXXX brother XXXX XXXX is the XXXX the owner of this account thats reporting I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence | 1 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| 719 | 13 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| as added Pub. L. 95109 | 8 |
| 719 | 5 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715
Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715 has accumulated 13 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 5 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to ( Pu, and the most recent logged activity is XXXX XXXX , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715 reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 23.1% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "title VIII", and the single most common underlying issue is "as added Pub. L. 95109".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715 have?
Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715 has received 13 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715 respond to complaints on time?
Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715 has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715?
The most common issue reported against Engelhardt v. Gravens ( mo ) 281 SW 715 is "as added Pub. L. 95109" in the "title VIII" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
