each time I called I was lobbied to let them check my credit so they could increase my limit even though we all know now that banks grow rich by selling our personal information as a default instead of leaving it for customers to solicit themselves if they in some unlikely scenario they wanted their data compromised

What the CFPB Record Shows About each time I called I was lobbied to let them check my credit so they could increase my limit even though we all know now that banks grow rich by selling our personal information as a default instead of leaving it for customers to solicit themselves if they in some unlikely scenario they wanted their data compromised

each time I called I was lobbied to let them check my credit so they could increase my limit even though we all know now that banks grow rich by selling our personal information as a default instead of leaving it for customers to solicit themselves if they in some unlikely scenario they wanted their data compromised has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Toda, and the most recent logged activity is Today, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, each time I called I was lobbied to let them check my credit so they could increase my limit even though we all know now that banks grow rich by selling our personal information as a default instead of leaving it for customers to solicit themselves if they in some unlikely scenario they wanted their data compromised reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 100% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "after a Slate rep. incorrectly informed me XXXX XXXX had not confirmed the payment", and the single most common underlying issue is "another rep confirmed that Chase ( parent company of Slate ) had indeed received the payment of {$530.00} but was holding my money ( earning interest ) and withholding these funds from my use for an additional 5 days until XX/XX/XXXX. The excuse given was that because I had chosen to increase my payment to approximately 10 % above my limit of {$500.00}".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating each time I called I was lobbied to let them check my credit so they could increase my limit even though we all know now that banks grow rich by selling our personal information as a default instead of leaving it for customers to solicit themselves if they in some unlikely scenario they wanted their data compromised: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.