Total complaints
1
Filed since Prio
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Prio. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Prio
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX complaint mix by product
- PrimeLending 1 100.0% – 0% relief
How due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| PrimeLending selected XXXX XXXX as the certified HUD consultant for my 203 ( k ) loan pro gram. Because of PrimeLendings longstanding relationship with XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX | 1 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| XXXX XXXX failed to monitor XXXX XXXX work product on the Property. That is | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| XXXX XXXX created a 203 ( k ) con struction loan brochure that illegally recommended XXXX XXXX XXXX . Unbeknownst to me | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX
due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Prio, and the most recent logged activity is Prior to c, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "PrimeLending selected XXXX XXXX as the certified HUD consultant for my 203 ( k ) loan pro gram. Because of PrimeLendings longstanding relationship with XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "XXXX XXXX created a 203 ( k ) con struction loan brochure that illegally recommended XXXX XXXX XXXX . Unbeknownst to me".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX have?
due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX respond to complaints on time?
due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX?
The most common issue reported against due to the inappropriate relationship and contention between XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX is "XXXX XXXX created a 203 ( k ) con struction loan brochure that illegally recommended XXXX XXXX XXXX . Unbeknownst to me" in the "PrimeLending selected XXXX XXXX as the certified HUD consultant for my 203 ( k ) loan pro gram. Because of PrimeLendings longstanding relationship with XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
