Total complaints
1
Filed since I wa
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows disputed the charge at closing. This allegation was not raised until well after the loan was closed's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since I wa. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since I wa
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How disputed the charge at closing. This allegation was not raised until well after the loan was closed's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| 2016. She stated that XXXX of my old borrowers submitted a complaint '' XXXX could not tell me the name of the borrower at that time. Through her explanation of the complaint issued I assumed it was XXXX XXXX. XXXX stated that XXXX was seeking money for the appraisal as promised. I told XXXX that I was not the individual who made that promise to XXXX XXXX but I would look through my emails and correspondence with her to see if I could help both parties come to a resolution. We agreed that we would get back in touch after the weekend and then I received the below email from XXXX. ( please note that XXXX wrote me this email using the Subject header of a previous email exchange ) From : XXXX XXXX [ mailto : XXXXXXXXXXXX ] Sent : Thursday | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| funded | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| 2016 XXXX PM To : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX Subject : RE : VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT REQUEST This is our response : Finally | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
disputed the charge at closing. This allegation was not raised until well after the loan was closed has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I wa, and the most recent logged activity is I was cont, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, disputed the charge at closing. This allegation was not raised until well after the loan was closed reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "2016. She stated that XXXX of my old borrowers submitted a complaint '' XXXX could not tell me the name of the borrower at that time. Through her explanation of the complaint issued I assumed it was XXXX XXXX. XXXX stated that XXXX was seeking money for the appraisal as promised. I told XXXX that I was not the individual who made that promise to XXXX XXXX but I would look through my emails and correspondence with her to see if I could help both parties come to a resolution. We agreed that we would get back in touch after the weekend and then I received the below email from XXXX. ( please note that XXXX wrote me this email using the Subject header of a previous email exchange ) From : XXXX XXXX [ mailto : XXXXXXXXXXXX ] Sent : Thursday", and the single most common underlying issue is "2016 XXXX PM To : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX Subject : RE : VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT REQUEST This is our response : Finally".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating disputed the charge at closing. This allegation was not raised until well after the loan was closed: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
disputed the charge at closing. This allegation was not raised until well after the loan was closed has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
disputed the charge at closing. This allegation was not raised until well after the loan was closed has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against disputed the charge at closing. This allegation was not raised until well after the loan was closed is "2016 XXXX PM To : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX Subject : RE : VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT REQUEST This is our response : Finally" in the "2016. She stated that XXXX of my old borrowers submitted a complaint '' XXXX could not tell me the name of the borrower at that time. Through her explanation of the complaint issued I assumed it was XXXX XXXX. XXXX stated that XXXX was seeking money for the appraisal as promised. I told XXXX that I was not the individual who made that promise to XXXX XXXX but I would look through my emails and correspondence with her to see if I could help both parties come to a resolution. We agreed that we would get back in touch after the weekend and then I received the below email from XXXX. ( please note that XXXX wrote me this email using the Subject header of a previous email exchange ) From : XXXX XXXX [ mailto : XXXXXXXXXXXX ] Sent : Thursday" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.