Total complaints
1
Filed since When
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows despite the fact that this will invariably impact my XXXX XXXX. The most CITI was willing to do was TEMPORARILY freeze the new fraudulent account's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since When. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since When
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How despite the fact that this will invariably impact my XXXX XXXX. The most CITI was willing to do was TEMPORARILY freeze the new fraudulent account's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| they refused to rectify the situation. They stated that an account had been made in my name ( not by me ) but refused to provide additional information | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| but they stated that it could not be closed as it had just been created.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,CITIBANK | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| so I obviously would not know ). They did eventually confirm that they had opened this line of credit without my SSN having ever been provided. I am confused how a bank goes about opening lines of credit in peoples names without basic steps like this to verify their identity. Again | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
despite the fact that this will invariably impact my XXXX XXXX. The most CITI was willing to do was TEMPORARILY freeze the new fraudulent account has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to When, and the most recent logged activity is When I con, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, despite the fact that this will invariably impact my XXXX XXXX. The most CITI was willing to do was TEMPORARILY freeze the new fraudulent account reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "they refused to rectify the situation. They stated that an account had been made in my name ( not by me ) but refused to provide additional information", and the single most common underlying issue is "so I obviously would not know ). They did eventually confirm that they had opened this line of credit without my SSN having ever been provided. I am confused how a bank goes about opening lines of credit in peoples names without basic steps like this to verify their identity. Again".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating despite the fact that this will invariably impact my XXXX XXXX. The most CITI was willing to do was TEMPORARILY freeze the new fraudulent account: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
despite the fact that this will invariably impact my XXXX XXXX. The most CITI was willing to do was TEMPORARILY freeze the new fraudulent account has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
despite the fact that this will invariably impact my XXXX XXXX. The most CITI was willing to do was TEMPORARILY freeze the new fraudulent account has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against despite the fact that this will invariably impact my XXXX XXXX. The most CITI was willing to do was TEMPORARILY freeze the new fraudulent account is "so I obviously would not know ). They did eventually confirm that they had opened this line of credit without my SSN having ever been provided. I am confused how a bank goes about opening lines of credit in peoples names without basic steps like this to verify their identity. Again" in the "they refused to rectify the situation. They stated that an account had been made in my name ( not by me ) but refused to provide additional information" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.