Total complaints
1
Filed since I be
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows dated XX/XX/XXXX. The letter from XXXX XXXX was confusing because it failed to address if it was now the new debt collector and Resurgent was not.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since I be. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since I be
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How dated XX/XX/XXXX. The letter from XXXX XXXX was confusing because it failed to address if it was now the new debt collector and Resurgent was not.'s 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| dba XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I sent the company a debt validation letter in the mail via USPS. I was responding to the companys hired debt collector | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
dated XX/XX/XXXX. The letter from XXXX XXXX was confusing because it failed to address if it was now the new debt collector and Resurgent was not. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I be, and the most recent logged activity is I believe , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, dated XX/XX/XXXX. The letter from XXXX XXXX was confusing because it failed to address if it was now the new debt collector and Resurgent was not. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "dba XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "I sent the company a debt validation letter in the mail via USPS. I was responding to the companys hired debt collector".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating dated XX/XX/XXXX. The letter from XXXX XXXX was confusing because it failed to address if it was now the new debt collector and Resurgent was not.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
dated XX/XX/XXXX. The letter from XXXX XXXX was confusing because it failed to address if it was now the new debt collector and Resurgent was not. has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
dated XX/XX/XXXX. The letter from XXXX XXXX was confusing because it failed to address if it was now the new debt collector and Resurgent was not. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against dated XX/XX/XXXX. The letter from XXXX XXXX was confusing because it failed to address if it was now the new debt collector and Resurgent was not. is "I sent the company a debt validation letter in the mail via USPS. I was responding to the companys hired debt collector" in the "dba XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.