comparable and are considered to be good indications of value. Most weight was placed on sal es 1 and 2 as they were bu ilt by the subjects builder and are located in the subjects development. The Subject Property and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX have the same floorplan and were sold by XXXX XXXX approximately three ( 3 ) mo nths apart. XXXX XXXX conclusion that the subject development lacked more current comparable sales is simply not true. The XXXX suspect that there were likely other available comparable sales that were not used because those buyers selected lenders other than PRIMELENDING and XXXX XXXX to provide financing. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Comparable Sale No. 5 The Subject Propertys URAR listed XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

What the CFPB Record Shows About comparable and are considered to be good indications of value. Most weight was placed on sal es 1 and 2 as they were bu ilt by the subjects builder and are located in the subjects development. The Subject Property and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX have the same floorplan and were sold by XXXX XXXX approximately three ( 3 ) mo nths apart. XXXX XXXX conclusion that the subject development lacked more current comparable sales is simply not true. The XXXX suspect that there were likely other available comparable sales that were not used because those buyers selected lenders other than PRIMELENDING and XXXX XXXX to provide financing. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Comparable Sale No. 5 The Subject Propertys URAR listed XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

comparable and are considered to be good indications of value. Most weight was placed on sal es 1 and 2 as they were bu ilt by the subjects builder and are located in the subjects development. The Subject Property and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX have the same floorplan and were sold by XXXX XXXX approximately three ( 3 ) mo nths apart. XXXX XXXX conclusion that the subject development lacked more current comparable sales is simply not true. The XXXX suspect that there were likely other available comparable sales that were not used because those buyers selected lenders other than PRIMELENDING and XXXX XXXX to provide financing. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Comparable Sale No. 5 The Subject Propertys URAR listed XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Bedr, and the most recent logged activity is Bedrooms :, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, comparable and are considered to be good indications of value. Most weight was placed on sal es 1 and 2 as they were bu ilt by the subjects builder and are located in the subjects development. The Subject Property and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX have the same floorplan and were sold by XXXX XXXX approximately three ( 3 ) mo nths apart. XXXX XXXX conclusion that the subject development lacked more current comparable sales is simply not true. The XXXX suspect that there were likely other available comparable sales that were not used because those buyers selected lenders other than PRIMELENDING and XXXX XXXX to provide financing. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Comparable Sale No. 5 The Subject Propertys URAR listed XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "XXXX XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "XXXX XXXX states : Due to the lack of more current comparable sales available at this time in the subject development".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating comparable and are considered to be good indications of value. Most weight was placed on sal es 1 and 2 as they were bu ilt by the subjects builder and are located in the subjects development. The Subject Property and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX have the same floorplan and were sold by XXXX XXXX approximately three ( 3 ) mo nths apart. XXXX XXXX conclusion that the subject development lacked more current comparable sales is simply not true. The XXXX suspect that there were likely other available comparable sales that were not used because those buyers selected lenders other than PRIMELENDING and XXXX XXXX to provide financing. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Comparable Sale No. 5 The Subject Propertys URAR listed XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.