Total complaints
1
Filed since 3. W
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows but was told it did not allow enough time for a processor to review it. The representative said theyd send an escalation ticket to the processor to see if theyd still consider reviewing it's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since 3. W. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since 3. W
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How but was told it did not allow enough time for a processor to review it. The representative said theyd send an escalation ticket to the processor to see if theyd still consider reviewing it's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| my loss mitigation application was never properly processed. This lack of communication and accountability from Flagstar Bank led to a wrongful foreclosure sale date of my property | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| but the processor declined to do so because the application has now expired. I attempted to explain once again that the documents were uploaded before the application expiration. But the representative stated that it takes XXXX hours for the upload to process into the system. I disagree that this should be grounds for my documents not to be accepted and reviewed due to the lenders uploading system. I did what was requested on my part. And that was to submit my documents by a certain date. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| at midnight before the foreclosure sale date an involuntary bankruptcy to stop the sale that should not have been scheduled because my application was still in process. After endless amounts of repetitive documents being submitted to the lender multiple times | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
but was told it did not allow enough time for a processor to review it. The representative said theyd send an escalation ticket to the processor to see if theyd still consider reviewing it has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to 3. W, and the most recent logged activity is 3. Wrongfu, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, but was told it did not allow enough time for a processor to review it. The representative said theyd send an escalation ticket to the processor to see if theyd still consider reviewing it reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "my loss mitigation application was never properly processed. This lack of communication and accountability from Flagstar Bank led to a wrongful foreclosure sale date of my property", and the single most common underlying issue is "at midnight before the foreclosure sale date an involuntary bankruptcy to stop the sale that should not have been scheduled because my application was still in process. After endless amounts of repetitive documents being submitted to the lender multiple times".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating but was told it did not allow enough time for a processor to review it. The representative said theyd send an escalation ticket to the processor to see if theyd still consider reviewing it: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
but was told it did not allow enough time for a processor to review it. The representative said theyd send an escalation ticket to the processor to see if theyd still consider reviewing it has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
but was told it did not allow enough time for a processor to review it. The representative said theyd send an escalation ticket to the processor to see if theyd still consider reviewing it has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against but was told it did not allow enough time for a processor to review it. The representative said theyd send an escalation ticket to the processor to see if theyd still consider reviewing it is "at midnight before the foreclosure sale date an involuntary bankruptcy to stop the sale that should not have been scheduled because my application was still in process. After endless amounts of repetitive documents being submitted to the lender multiple times" in the "my loss mitigation application was never properly processed. This lack of communication and accountability from Flagstar Bank led to a wrongful foreclosure sale date of my property" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.