Total complaints
1
Filed since I ca
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows but that the other {$130.00} was a fee from the XXXX XXXX. She printed out a letter which was supposedly mailed to me showing these fees ( see attachment ). I remarked that the letter was meaningless since it gave no information as to which back supposedly charged the fee and moreover's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since I ca. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since I ca
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How but that the other {$130.00} was a fee from the XXXX XXXX. She printed out a letter which was supposedly mailed to me showing these fees ( see attachment ). I remarked that the letter was meaningless since it gave no information as to which back supposedly charged the fee and moreover's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| they would have been deducted from my account | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| there was no signature on the letter! She said that the one I would receive in the mail would be signed and left it at that. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| exchange or otherwise ) I then went back to the branch manager | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
but that the other {$130.00} was a fee from the XXXX XXXX. She printed out a letter which was supposedly mailed to me showing these fees ( see attachment ). I remarked that the letter was meaningless since it gave no information as to which back supposedly charged the fee and moreover has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I ca, and the most recent logged activity is I called X, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, but that the other {$130.00} was a fee from the XXXX XXXX. She printed out a letter which was supposedly mailed to me showing these fees ( see attachment ). I remarked that the letter was meaningless since it gave no information as to which back supposedly charged the fee and moreover reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "they would have been deducted from my account", and the single most common underlying issue is "exchange or otherwise ) I then went back to the branch manager".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating but that the other {$130.00} was a fee from the XXXX XXXX. She printed out a letter which was supposedly mailed to me showing these fees ( see attachment ). I remarked that the letter was meaningless since it gave no information as to which back supposedly charged the fee and moreover: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
but that the other {$130.00} was a fee from the XXXX XXXX. She printed out a letter which was supposedly mailed to me showing these fees ( see attachment ). I remarked that the letter was meaningless since it gave no information as to which back supposedly charged the fee and moreover has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
but that the other {$130.00} was a fee from the XXXX XXXX. She printed out a letter which was supposedly mailed to me showing these fees ( see attachment ). I remarked that the letter was meaningless since it gave no information as to which back supposedly charged the fee and moreover has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against but that the other {$130.00} was a fee from the XXXX XXXX. She printed out a letter which was supposedly mailed to me showing these fees ( see attachment ). I remarked that the letter was meaningless since it gave no information as to which back supposedly charged the fee and moreover is "exchange or otherwise ) I then went back to the branch manager" in the "they would have been deducted from my account" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.