Total complaints
1
Filed since Expe
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows but shows inflated charge-off balance of {$1600.00} Reporting monthly CO notations through XXXX with no activity post charge-off punishment and potential balance padding XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Paid {$1400.00} in XXXX's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Expe. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Expe
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How but shows inflated charge-off balance of {$1600.00} Reporting monthly CO notations through XXXX with no activity post charge-off punishment and potential balance padding XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Paid {$1400.00} in XXXX's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| re-aged | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| yet still reflects 120+ day lates in XXXX Charge-off continues to report despite being resolved inaccurate and misleading XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX Account opened in XXXX but still shows a collection balance in XXXX No new payment activity | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| but Experian reports it as past due in XX/XX/XXXX No payment activity or valid reporting history violates accuracy standards of the FCRA 3. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Bank Charged off but still reports Charge Off every single month Shows 152 % utilization ( over limit ) and ongoing delinquent behavior post-charge-off This is misleading | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
but shows inflated charge-off balance of {$1600.00} Reporting monthly CO notations through XXXX with no activity post charge-off punishment and potential balance padding XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Paid {$1400.00} in XXXX has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Expe, and the most recent logged activity is Experian e, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, but shows inflated charge-off balance of {$1600.00} Reporting monthly CO notations through XXXX with no activity post charge-off punishment and potential balance padding XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Paid {$1400.00} in XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "re-aged", and the single most common underlying issue is "but Experian reports it as past due in XX/XX/XXXX No payment activity or valid reporting history violates accuracy standards of the FCRA 3. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Bank Charged off but still reports Charge Off every single month Shows 152 % utilization ( over limit ) and ongoing delinquent behavior post-charge-off This is misleading".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating but shows inflated charge-off balance of {$1600.00} Reporting monthly CO notations through XXXX with no activity post charge-off punishment and potential balance padding XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Paid {$1400.00} in XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
but shows inflated charge-off balance of {$1600.00} Reporting monthly CO notations through XXXX with no activity post charge-off punishment and potential balance padding XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Paid {$1400.00} in XXXX has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
but shows inflated charge-off balance of {$1600.00} Reporting monthly CO notations through XXXX with no activity post charge-off punishment and potential balance padding XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Paid {$1400.00} in XXXX has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against but shows inflated charge-off balance of {$1600.00} Reporting monthly CO notations through XXXX with no activity post charge-off punishment and potential balance padding XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Paid {$1400.00} in XXXX is "but Experian reports it as past due in XX/XX/XXXX No payment activity or valid reporting history violates accuracy standards of the FCRA 3. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Bank Charged off but still reports Charge Off every single month Shows 152 % utilization ( over limit ) and ongoing delinquent behavior post-charge-off This is misleading" in the "re-aged" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.