Total complaints
2
Filed since The
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security
2 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
2 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security's complaint history from CFPB public records. 2 consumers have filed complaints since The . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
2
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
2
States Active
The
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security complaint mix by product
- fraudulently procured 2 100.0% – 0% relief
How but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security's 2 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| fraudulently procured under the guise of a Loan '' | 2 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| assign a Beneficial Right it never had to another Beneficiary XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Plaintiff '' More over the Assigment of Mortgage is Void because XXXX can not act as a nominee of XXXX because XXXX can only act as a nominee of the Lender and Lender 's successors Them XXXX was not a lender | 1 |
| assign a Beneficial Right it never had to another Beneficiary XXXX Plaintiff '' More over the Assigment of Mortgage is Void because XXXX can not act as a nominee of XXXX because Mers can only act as a nominee of the Lender and Lender 's successors Them XXXX was not a lender | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| but rather the Purchase of a Note '' into a pooling Investment Security | 2 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security
but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security has accumulated 2 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 2 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 2 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to The , and the most recent logged activity is The Nomin, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "fraudulently procured under the guise of a Loan ''", and the single most common underlying issue is "but rather the Purchase of a Note '' into a pooling Investment Security".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security have?
but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security has received 2 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security respond to complaints on time?
but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security?
The most common issue reported against but rather fraudulently allowed its name to be put on a Note and Deed of Trust or Mortgage to trick a Homeowner XXXX '' into signing a Deed of Trust or Mortgage to secure an Investment Security is "but rather the Purchase of a Note '' into a pooling Investment Security" in the "fraudulently procured under the guise of a Loan ''" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
