but of course that never happened. I want answers as to why I am being harassed for money. I want to know how they have my and my husband 's signatures on a document that was signed a full two weeks before I ever sent them any documents

What the CFPB Record Shows About but of course that never happened. I want answers as to why I am being harassed for money. I want to know how they have my and my husband 's signatures on a document that was signed a full two weeks before I ever sent them any documents

but of course that never happened. I want answers as to why I am being harassed for money. I want to know how they have my and my husband 's signatures on a document that was signed a full two weeks before I ever sent them any documents has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I wa, and the most recent logged activity is I was sent, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, but of course that never happened. I want answers as to why I am being harassed for money. I want to know how they have my and my husband 's signatures on a document that was signed a full two weeks before I ever sent them any documents reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "and it was dated XX/XX/XXXX. I thought it was a scam at first because I had never seen the document before. I contacted XXXX with HFS to confirm that the fee being demanded was an error. I was instead informed that the fee was something I had agreed to. I was confused and upset because I knew that I had not sent any paperwork via XXXX ( the program that was used for the document HFS says I signed ) I sent all of my paperwork to HFS on or around XX/XX/XXXX. I explained this fact to XXXX and XXXX at HFS via email. However", and the single most common underlying issue is "and at no time was I sent nor did I or my husband sign a document agreeing to pay a processing fee. '' HFS is either forging my and my husband 's signatures or they are employing some other shady tactic to get me to pay them money I never agreed to pay. I have received several calls in the days since the first email on XX/XX/XXXX demanding payment".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating but of course that never happened. I want answers as to why I am being harassed for money. I want to know how they have my and my husband 's signatures on a document that was signed a full two weeks before I ever sent them any documents: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.