2026 data Public-data reference. official source

because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since ////. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
////
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since ////

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). Chase did: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% Chase did 100.0%
  • Chase did 1 100.0% 0% relief

How because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
Chase did in fact speak to someone at my insurance companya woman named XXXXand according to Chases internal notes 1

Top States

State Complaints
Chase has determined that it is absolved of all responsibility. Chase instead takes the position that I am liable for the effects of its nonpayment 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
it wasn't paid in full 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full

because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to ////, and the most recent logged activity is //// I was, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "Chase did in fact speak to someone at my insurance companya woman named XXXXand according to Chases internal notes", and the single most common underlying issue is "it wasn't paid in full".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full have?

because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full respond to complaints on time?

because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full?

The most common issue reported against because Chases notation falsely states ( per XXXX ) that my premium had been paid in full is "it wasn't paid in full" in the "Chase did in fact speak to someone at my insurance companya woman named XXXXand according to Chases internal notes" product category.

Related