2026 data Public-data reference. official source

based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since I sl. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
I sl
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since I sl

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). after conversing: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% after conversing 100.0%
  • after conversing 1 100.0% 0% relief

How based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
after conversing with this out-of state attorney more in depth 1

Top States

State Complaints
with highly flawed evidence ( interogatorries from the actual mortgage holder who was in default on the debt. ),,Weltman 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
she advised me to extensively document this bizarre set of facts that had led Mr. XXXX to ruthlessly and viciously pursue a funds from me. She also advised me to document any and all future correspondence with him. I did that 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction

based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to I sl, and the most recent logged activity is I slowly b, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "after conversing with this out-of state attorney more in depth", and the single most common underlying issue is "she advised me to extensively document this bizarre set of facts that had led Mr. XXXX to ruthlessly and viciously pursue a funds from me. She also advised me to document any and all future correspondence with him. I did that".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction have?

based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction respond to complaints on time?

based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction?

The most common issue reported against based on a default judgment rendered in a court that had no jurisdiction is "she advised me to extensively document this bizarre set of facts that had led Mr. XXXX to ruthlessly and viciously pursue a funds from me. She also advised me to document any and all future correspondence with him. I did that" in the "after conversing with this out-of state attorney more in depth" product category.

Related