2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Rath. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Rath
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since Rath

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). they fraudulently: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% they fraudulently 100.0%
  • they fraudulently 1 100.0% 0% relief

How Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
they fraudulently kept pretending to us that BofA still owned and held our home loans. We already had ( at the time of taking out the mortgage ) more than {$4.00} XXXX of market-equity in the home in XXXX according to BofAs own appraisals. This allowed BofA to fake an illegal assignment ( without endorsement ) of the XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX ARM NOTE to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( in XX/XX/XXXX ) and the XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Note to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( in XX/XX/XXXX ) to give an impression of conveyance of the XXXX home loans to the two private trusts XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX respectively 1

Top States

State Complaints
loan payment collection frauds 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
less holding any XXXX XXXX XXXX or XXXX. BofA then used XXXX XXXX XXXX 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds

Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Rath, and the most recent logged activity is Rather, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "they fraudulently kept pretending to us that BofA still owned and held our home loans. We already had ( at the time of taking out the mortgage ) more than {$4.00} XXXX of market-equity in the home in XXXX according to BofAs own appraisals. This allowed BofA to fake an illegal assignment ( without endorsement ) of the XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX ARM NOTE to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( in XX/XX/XXXX ) and the XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Note to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( in XX/XX/XXXX ) to give an impression of conveyance of the XXXX home loans to the two private trusts XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX respectively", and the single most common underlying issue is "less holding any XXXX XXXX XXXX or XXXX. BofA then used XXXX XXXX XXXX".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds have?

Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds respond to complaints on time?

Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds?

The most common issue reported against Bankruptcy Court Secured-Creditor Claims frauds is "less holding any XXXX XXXX XXXX or XXXX. BofA then used XXXX XXXX XXXX" in the "they fraudulently kept pretending to us that BofA still owned and held our home loans. We already had ( at the time of taking out the mortgage ) more than {$4.00} XXXX of market-equity in the home in XXXX according to BofAs own appraisals. This allowed BofA to fake an illegal assignment ( without endorsement ) of the XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX ARM NOTE to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( in XX/XX/XXXX ) and the XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Note to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( in XX/XX/XXXX ) to give an impression of conveyance of the XXXX home loans to the two private trusts XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX respectively" product category.

Related