2026 data Public-data reference. official source

back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times

2 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

2 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times's complaint history from CFPB public records. 2 consumers have filed complaints since Afte. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

2
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
2
States Active
Afte
Since

Total complaints

2

Filed since Afte

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 2

back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 2 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). closed my: 2 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% closed my 100.0%
  • closed my 2 100.0% 0% relief

How back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times's 2 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
closed my account and were investigating. The second letter thanked me for withdrawing my fraud claim and they were pleased that I was able to resolve the matter. I called Security Operations immediately on XX/XX/XXXX to dispute that I withdrew my fraud complaint. XXXX '' said that the notes in the file said that I told a rep that the attempt to open my account was real and valid '' and I withdrew my claim. I adamantly stated that I did not tell anyone this 2

Top States

State Complaints
so he could speak to a manager. I was told my account was closed permanently. I requested again that the hard inquiry be removed and communicated to Equifax as Identity Theft. I told them that I have disputed it twice. XXXX told me that the hard credit inquiry was not something they deal with. They only deal with the actual investigation and I needed to reach out to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX as the inquiry was made at the store level. I explained that I was getting the run around 1
so he could speak to a manager. I was told my account was closed permanently. I requested again that the hard inquiry be removed and communicated to XXXX as Identity Theft. I told them that I have disputed it twice. XXXX told me that the hard credit inquiry was not something they deal with. They only deal with the actual investigation and I needed to reach out to Home Depot Credit Care as the inquiry was made at the store level. I explained that I was getting the run around 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
and that it was not permanently closed. I called back that same morning to XXXX XXXX XXXX and spoke to another person who was able to place a security password on my information. I have disputed the hard inquiry ( XX/XX/XXXX ) on my Equifax credit 2 times ( XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX ). I sent Equifax my police report dated XX/XX/XXXX and my FTC report dated XX/XX/XXXX. Equifax will not remove the hard inquiry. The results are as follows : Inquiries are a factual record of file access and will remain on the Equifax credit file two years from the report date of the inquiry. '' I submitted a personal statement : The hard inquiry from XXXX is identity theft when a person went to the store and tried to open account in my name using my PII and SSN and XXXX is aware of this as they reached out to me to verify my identity. '' On XX/XX/XXXX I received another letter from XXXX XXXX ( dated XX/XX/XXXX ) stating they completed the investigation regarding my claim that the account was fraudulently opened using personal information. Based on their review they determined that I am responsible for the account and charges based on 3 factors that are untrue and/or not relevant. 1. The information received as part of the investigation does not support the claim that the account was fraudulently opened using personal information- XXXX XXXX called me personally to receive my verification that it was me who applied for credit. I told them it was not me. They told me that someone went into the store claiming to be me. 2. I had knowledge of this debt and my actions indicate the same when I failed to call or question the resulting account or charge- When XXXX XXXX called me 1
and that it was not permanently closed. I called back that same morning to Home Depot Security and spoke to another person who was able to place a security password on my information. I have disputed the hard inquiry ( XX/XX/XXXX ) on my XXXX credit 2 times ( XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX ). I sent XXXX my police report dated XX/XX/XXXX and my FTC report dated XX/XX/XXXX. XXXX will not remove the hard inquiry. The results are as follows : Inquiries are a factual record of file access and will remain on the XXXX credit file two years from the report date of the inquiry. '' I submitted a personal statement : The hard inquiry from XXXX is identity theft when a person went to the store and tried to open account in my name using my PII and SSN andXX/XX/XXXXis aware of this as they reached out to me to verify my identity. '' On XX/XX/XXXX I received another letter from Home Depot ( dated XX/XX/XXXX ) stating they completed the investigation regarding my claim that the account was fraudulently opened using personal information. Based on their review they determined that I am responsible for the account and charges based on 3 factors that are untrue and/or not relevant. 1. The information received as part of the investigation does not support the claim that the account was fraudulently opened using personal information- Home Depot called me personally to receive my verification that it was me who applied for credit. I told them it was not me. They told me that someone went into the store claiming to be me. 2. I had knowledge of this debt and my actions indicate the same when I failed to call or question the resulting account or charge- When Home Depot called me 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times

back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times has accumulated 2 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 2 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 2 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Afte, and the most recent logged activity is After this, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "closed my account and were investigating. The second letter thanked me for withdrawing my fraud claim and they were pleased that I was able to resolve the matter. I called Security Operations immediately on XX/XX/XXXX to dispute that I withdrew my fraud complaint. XXXX '' said that the notes in the file said that I told a rep that the attempt to open my account was real and valid '' and I withdrew my claim. I adamantly stated that I did not tell anyone this", and the single most common underlying issue is "and that it was not permanently closed. I called back that same morning to XXXX XXXX XXXX and spoke to another person who was able to place a security password on my information. I have disputed the hard inquiry ( XX/XX/XXXX ) on my Equifax credit 2 times ( XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX ). I sent Equifax my police report dated XX/XX/XXXX and my FTC report dated XX/XX/XXXX. Equifax will not remove the hard inquiry. The results are as follows : Inquiries are a factual record of file access and will remain on the Equifax credit file two years from the report date of the inquiry. '' I submitted a personal statement : The hard inquiry from XXXX is identity theft when a person went to the store and tried to open account in my name using my PII and SSN and XXXX is aware of this as they reached out to me to verify my identity. '' On XX/XX/XXXX I received another letter from XXXX XXXX ( dated XX/XX/XXXX ) stating they completed the investigation regarding my claim that the account was fraudulently opened using personal information. Based on their review they determined that I am responsible for the account and charges based on 3 factors that are untrue and/or not relevant. 1. The information received as part of the investigation does not support the claim that the account was fraudulently opened using personal information- XXXX XXXX called me personally to receive my verification that it was me who applied for credit. I told them it was not me. They told me that someone went into the store claiming to be me. 2. I had knowledge of this debt and my actions indicate the same when I failed to call or question the resulting account or charge- When XXXX XXXX called me".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times have?

back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times has received 2 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times respond to complaints on time?

back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times?

The most common issue reported against back in XXXX! I called Security Operations again on XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX ''. I was put on hold several times is "and that it was not permanently closed. I called back that same morning to XXXX XXXX XXXX and spoke to another person who was able to place a security password on my information. I have disputed the hard inquiry ( XX/XX/XXXX ) on my Equifax credit 2 times ( XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX ). I sent Equifax my police report dated XX/XX/XXXX and my FTC report dated XX/XX/XXXX. Equifax will not remove the hard inquiry. The results are as follows : Inquiries are a factual record of file access and will remain on the Equifax credit file two years from the report date of the inquiry. '' I submitted a personal statement : The hard inquiry from XXXX is identity theft when a person went to the store and tried to open account in my name using my PII and SSN and XXXX is aware of this as they reached out to me to verify my identity. '' On XX/XX/XXXX I received another letter from XXXX XXXX ( dated XX/XX/XXXX ) stating they completed the investigation regarding my claim that the account was fraudulently opened using personal information. Based on their review they determined that I am responsible for the account and charges based on 3 factors that are untrue and/or not relevant. 1. The information received as part of the investigation does not support the claim that the account was fraudulently opened using personal information- XXXX XXXX called me personally to receive my verification that it was me who applied for credit. I told them it was not me. They told me that someone went into the store claiming to be me. 2. I had knowledge of this debt and my actions indicate the same when I failed to call or question the resulting account or charge- When XXXX XXXX called me" in the "closed my account and were investigating. The second letter thanked me for withdrawing my fraud claim and they were pleased that I was able to resolve the matter. I called Security Operations immediately on XX/XX/XXXX to dispute that I withdrew my fraud complaint. XXXX '' said that the notes in the file said that I told a rep that the attempt to open my account was real and valid '' and I withdrew my claim. I adamantly stated that I did not tell anyone this" product category.

Related