Total complaints
1
Filed since Ulti
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows as XXXX XXXX XXXX servicing guidelines suggest that the 80 % threshold applies to any request made under the significant improvements '' prong for PMI cancellation's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Ulti. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Ulti
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How as XXXX XXXX XXXX servicing guidelines suggest that the 80 % threshold applies to any request made under the significant improvements '' prong for PMI cancellation's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I believed these ostensible flaws in the XXXX did not matter | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and at least two other servicers of XXXX XXXX loans indicate explicitly in online materials that the 80 % threshold applies to requests for cancellation of PMI on XXXX XXXX mortgages when made under the significant improvements prong | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| Chase denied PMI cancellation on the basis that the threshold for cancellation was actually 75 % because my loan was about 3 months past its two-year anniversary ( note that I began this process BEFORE the two-year anniversary | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
as XXXX XXXX XXXX servicing guidelines suggest that the 80 % threshold applies to any request made under the significant improvements '' prong for PMI cancellation has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Ulti, and the most recent logged activity is Ultimately, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, as XXXX XXXX XXXX servicing guidelines suggest that the 80 % threshold applies to any request made under the significant improvements '' prong for PMI cancellation reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I believed these ostensible flaws in the XXXX did not matter", and the single most common underlying issue is "Chase denied PMI cancellation on the basis that the threshold for cancellation was actually 75 % because my loan was about 3 months past its two-year anniversary ( note that I began this process BEFORE the two-year anniversary".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating as XXXX XXXX XXXX servicing guidelines suggest that the 80 % threshold applies to any request made under the significant improvements '' prong for PMI cancellation: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
as XXXX XXXX XXXX servicing guidelines suggest that the 80 % threshold applies to any request made under the significant improvements '' prong for PMI cancellation has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
as XXXX XXXX XXXX servicing guidelines suggest that the 80 % threshold applies to any request made under the significant improvements '' prong for PMI cancellation has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against as XXXX XXXX XXXX servicing guidelines suggest that the 80 % threshold applies to any request made under the significant improvements '' prong for PMI cancellation is "Chase denied PMI cancellation on the basis that the threshold for cancellation was actually 75 % because my loan was about 3 months past its two-year anniversary ( note that I began this process BEFORE the two-year anniversary" in the "I believed these ostensible flaws in the XXXX did not matter" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.