2026 data Public-data reference. official source

as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since In t. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
In t
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since In t

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). Gross Polowy: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% Gross Polowy 100.0%
  • Gross Polowy 1 100.0% 0% relief

How as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
Gross Polowy said they reviewed the facts of the case and documents ( including a lost note affidavit stating the alleged note was lost more than eleven years ago ). Gross Polowy also affirmed to the court that they are the attorney for Plaintiff in the action 1

Top States

State Complaints
and have no involvement with the foreclosure process. '' We have also been informed that XXXX is not an employee or representative of XXXX 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
Esq. had consulted about the facts of this case with the following representative of Plaintiff : Name XXXX 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property

as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to In t, and the most recent logged activity is In their C, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "Gross Polowy said they reviewed the facts of the case and documents ( including a lost note affidavit stating the alleged note was lost more than eleven years ago ). Gross Polowy also affirmed to the court that they are the attorney for Plaintiff in the action", and the single most common underlying issue is "Esq. had consulted about the facts of this case with the following representative of Plaintiff : Name XXXX".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property have?

as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property respond to complaints on time?

as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property?

The most common issue reported against as recently as XX/XX/2016 that U.S. Bank is not the lender or servicer for this property is "Esq. had consulted about the facts of this case with the following representative of Plaintiff : Name XXXX" in the "Gross Polowy said they reviewed the facts of the case and documents ( including a lost note affidavit stating the alleged note was lost more than eleven years ago ). Gross Polowy also affirmed to the court that they are the attorney for Plaintiff in the action" product category.

Related