2026 data Public-data reference. official source

as a result of this banks illegal activities

8 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

8 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows as a result of this banks illegal activities's complaint history from CFPB public records. 8 consumers have filed complaints since Kind. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

8
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Kind
Since

Total complaints

8

Filed since Kind

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

as a result of this banks illegal activities complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 8

as a result of this banks illegal activities complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 8 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). XXXX XXXX: 7 complaints (87.5%), resolution 0.0% XXXX XXXX 87.5% XXXX XXXX: 1 complaints (12.5%), resolution 0.0% XXXX XXXX 12.5%
  • XXXX XXXX 7 87.5% 0% relief
  • XXXX XXXX 1 12.5% 0% relief

How as a result of this banks illegal activities's 8 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX United Communities last response to my clearly issued factual complaint is yet 7
XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX last response to my clearly issued factual complaint is yet 1

Top States

State Complaints
my credit has been dramatically affected 8

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
pathetic attempt to transfer blame without ANY BASIS OR FACTS TO BACK UP THEIR CLAIMS. Their response that I changed my mind on extending the forbearance extension under the cares act is a sad weak approach that one takes when they have no other avenue to go. You have REFUSED to provide that proof and even went as far to communicate to me that it is not accessible without formal legal actions being taken against you to do so. As incredibly absurd as it is that you have no desire to simply reconcile this issue by revealing the TRUTH 8

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About as a result of this banks illegal activities

as a result of this banks illegal activities has accumulated 8 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 8 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Kind, and the most recent logged activity is Kind Regar, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, as a result of this banks illegal activities reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX United Communities last response to my clearly issued factual complaint is yet", and the single most common underlying issue is "pathetic attempt to transfer blame without ANY BASIS OR FACTS TO BACK UP THEIR CLAIMS. Their response that I changed my mind on extending the forbearance extension under the cares act is a sad weak approach that one takes when they have no other avenue to go. You have REFUSED to provide that proof and even went as far to communicate to me that it is not accessible without formal legal actions being taken against you to do so. As incredibly absurd as it is that you have no desire to simply reconcile this issue by revealing the TRUTH".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating as a result of this banks illegal activities: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does as a result of this banks illegal activities have?

as a result of this banks illegal activities has received 8 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does as a result of this banks illegal activities respond to complaints on time?

as a result of this banks illegal activities has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about as a result of this banks illegal activities?

The most common issue reported against as a result of this banks illegal activities is "pathetic attempt to transfer blame without ANY BASIS OR FACTS TO BACK UP THEIR CLAIMS. Their response that I changed my mind on extending the forbearance extension under the cares act is a sad weak approach that one takes when they have no other avenue to go. You have REFUSED to provide that proof and even went as far to communicate to me that it is not accessible without formal legal actions being taken against you to do so. As incredibly absurd as it is that you have no desire to simply reconcile this issue by revealing the TRUTH" in the "XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX United Communities last response to my clearly issued factual complaint is yet" product category.

Related